Author
Listed:
- Kahurangi Jean Dey
(Te Hikuwai Rangahau Hauora|Health Services Research Centre, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6011, New Zealand
Te Kura Tātai Hauora|School of Health, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6011, New Zealand)
- Kankshita Dewan
(Te Hikuwai Rangahau Hauora|Health Services Research Centre, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6011, New Zealand
Te Kura Tātai Hauora|School of Health, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6011, New Zealand)
- Kim Murray
(WELLfed, Porirua 5024, New Zealand)
- Donna Hiroki
(Te Hikuwai Rangahau Hauora|Health Services Research Centre, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6011, New Zealand
WELLfed, Porirua 5024, New Zealand)
- Mona Jeffreys
(Te Hikuwai Rangahau Hauora|Health Services Research Centre, Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6011, New Zealand)
Abstract
Introduction: WELLfed is a community-based adult education programme focused on improving food literacy, with a stated aim to “nourish communities through food and connections”, in a low-income community in Aotearoa New Zealand. Adult learners are taught food preparation and cooking skills in weekly interactive sessions. Here, we describe two pilot phases of a three-phase evaluation. Methods: Our overall aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of the WELLfed programme. Phase 1, in keeping with the co-design approach of WELLfed, co-designed outcome measures through five focus groups ( n = 20) involving a wide range of stakeholders. Phase 2 developed and refined a survey based on these co-designed measures. The survey was administered to WELLfed learners at baseline ( n = 15) and again towards the end of their programme (follow-up n = 12). Wilcoxon rank sum tests of significance were performed, restricted to participants with both baseline and follow-up data. Results: Five domains of importance identified in Phase 1 were as follows: (i) engagement support, (ii) food knowledge and skills, (iii) personal development, (iv) relationship transformation, and (v) community flourishing. Phase 2 findings include increased comfort level at engagement ( p = 0.063). Food knowledge and preparation skills improved on a range of factors. All metrics of self-confidence and self-efficacy increased, with the greatest change being the ability to find support in times of crisis. Self-reported excellent or very good health increased ( p = 0.050). Fewer people reported food running out due to a lack of money ( p = 0.016) or eating less because of a lack of money ( p = 0.008). Conclusions: The pilot study shows the effectiveness of the WELLfed programme for improving food knowledge and skills, reducing food insecurity, and improving health outcomes. Further research with a larger sample size is required to confirm these pilot results.
Suggested Citation
Kahurangi Jean Dey & Kankshita Dewan & Kim Murray & Donna Hiroki & Mona Jeffreys, 2025.
"A Pilot Evaluation of WELLfed, a Community-Based Adult Education Intervention,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(4), pages 1-14, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:526-:d:1624223
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:526-:d:1624223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.