IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i3p344-d1600400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Primary Motives and Barriers to Physical Activity Participation Among Students Registered at a Semi-Rural University: A Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Silindokuhle Sanele Radebe

    (Department of Human Movement Science, Faculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa)

  • Gerrit Jan Breukelman

    (Department of Human Movement Science, Faculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa)

  • Anné S. Joubert

    (Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa)

  • Lourens Millard

    (Department of Human Movement Science, Faculty of Science, Agriculture and Engineering, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa 3886, South Africa)

Abstract

Physical inactivity among university students remains a global health concern, especially in semi-rural settings where unique barriers such as limited facilities, cultural norms, and inadequate transportation persist. This study aimed to identify the primary motivations and barriers to physical activity participation among students at a semi-rural university, providing insights for tailored interventions. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was used. In the quantitative phase, 414 questionnaires were distributed across four faculties, with 328 completed responses analysed using t -tests and factor analysis. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with 23 students, analysed through conventional content analysis. The quantitative findings revealed key motivators for physical activity, which included enjoyment (mean = 4.51, p < 0.001), social interaction (mean = 3.99, p < 0.001), and health benefits (mean = 3.27, p = 0.001). However, for barriers, heavy academic workload reached statistical significance (mean = 3.88, p < 0.001). In contrast, qualitative data uncovered additional barriers such as insufficient facilities and poor communication, which were not captured in the quantitative phase. Factor analysis identified four constructs for motivations (e.g., coaching, social, health, enjoyment) and barriers (e.g., club processes, excuses, external factors, lack of interest). Qualitative data corroborated these findings, highlighting issues such as insufficient visibility of physical activity programs, time barriers, and inconsistent coaching quality. This study underscores the importance of addressing structural barriers, such as upgrading facilities, improving communication strategies, and enhancing coaching quality, to increase physical activity participation. By implementing strategic interventions, universities can foster inclusive environments that better support students’ well-being and engagement, ultimately promoting healthier lifestyles among university populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Silindokuhle Sanele Radebe & Gerrit Jan Breukelman & Anné S. Joubert & Lourens Millard, 2025. "Primary Motives and Barriers to Physical Activity Participation Among Students Registered at a Semi-Rural University: A Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(3), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:344-:d:1600400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/3/344/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/3/344/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iker Sáez & Josu Solabarrieta & Isabel Rubio, 2021. "Motivation for Physical Activity in University Students and Its Relation with Gender, Amount of Activities, and Sport Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Herbert Chikafu & Moses J. Chimbari, 2020. "Levels and Correlates of Physical Activity in Rural Ingwavuma Community, uMkhanyakude District, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diego Andrés Heredia-León & David Manzano-Sánchez & Alberto Gómez-Mármol & Alfonso Valero-Valenzuela, 2022. "Contributing to SDG 3 through Support for Trainer Autonomy: Relationship with Motivation, Basic Psychological Needs and the Intention to Be Physically Active," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Peiyao Ji & Shihan Zhou & Ruohang Wang & Hongying Fan & Yan Wang, 2022. "Subjective Exercise Experience and Group Cohesion among Chinese Participating in Square Dance: A Moderated Mediation Model of Years of Participation and Gender," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:344-:d:1600400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.