IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i11p1680-d1787955.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evacuation and Transportation Barriers Among Vulnerable Populations in Natural Hazard-Related Disasters: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Yuriko Matsuo

    (Joe C. Wen School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • Kathryn Kietzman

    (Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
    Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • Ron D. Hays

    (David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
    RAND, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA)

  • Yeonsu Song

    (Joe C. Wen School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
    David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
    Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, North Hills, CA 91343, USA)

Abstract

Background and Aim: Natural hazard-related disasters such as wildfires, hurricanes, earthquakes, and floods pose significant risks to older adults, individuals with disabilities, and those with chronic health conditions. Transportation-related challenges during and after evacuation can severely impact their safety, mobility, and recovery. This scoping review examines the current evidence to identify research gaps and inform strategies to improve evacuation outcomes and long-term resilience for these at-risk groups. The STEPS framework (Spatial, Temporal, Economic, Physiological, Social) was applied to guide the analysis and interpretation of findings. Methods: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines and searched five databases, including PubMed, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL Complete, EMBASE, and Web of Science for primary studies on transportation and disaster evacuation among vulnerable populations. Results: Twenty studies were included. Four key areas of concern were identified: (1) immediate transportation barriers during evacuation, (2) prolonged transportation disruptions post-disaster, (3) anticipated logistical challenges in future evacuation planning, and (4) inconsistent and inaccessible communication of transportation-related information during emergencies. These challenges intersected with all five STEPS dimensions. Conclusions: Transportation barriers remain a persistent and under-addressed risk factor in disaster contexts for vulnerable groups. The STEPS framework helped reveal the multidimensional nature of these issues, emphasizing the need for integrated planning, assistive transport options, inclusive communication systems, and stronger public–private coordination. Future research should focus on collecting disaggregated data, evaluating interventions, and supporting inclusive policy reforms tailored to each type of disaster.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuriko Matsuo & Kathryn Kietzman & Ron D. Hays & Yeonsu Song, 2025. "Evacuation and Transportation Barriers Among Vulnerable Populations in Natural Hazard-Related Disasters: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(11), pages 1-29, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:11:p:1680-:d:1787955
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/11/1680/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/11/1680/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:11:p:1680-:d:1787955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.