IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i11p1672-d1787167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Post-COVID-Condition Rehabilitation and Recovery Intervention Delivered in a Football Club Community Trust

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Rimmer

    (Human Performance and Health Laboratory, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK)

  • Adam J. Herbert

    (Human Performance and Health Laboratory, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK)

  • Adam L. Kelly

    (Human Performance and Health Laboratory, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK)

  • Irfan Khawaja

    (Human Performance and Health Laboratory, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK)

  • Sam Lee

    (Burton Albion Community Trust, Burton-Upon-Trent DE13 0AR, UK)

  • Lewis A. Gough

    (Human Performance and Health Laboratory, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B15 3TN, UK)

Abstract

Aim: Post-COVID condition (PCC) is largely considered the biggest public health emergency in recent times. The role of exercise therapy in PCC is currently unknown, and evaluative studies are currently lacking in this area. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the effects of a football club community trust exercise rehabilitation programme on physical function and quality of life in individuals with PCC. Method: A mixed-methods retrospective design was employed, utilising a framework to assess the programme’s reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM). Quantitative data (questionnaires and physiological assessments) were collected at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks during the programme, and at 6 months post-intervention ( n = 7). Qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured focus groups at week 12 ( n = 7) and 12 months ( n = 5) post-intervention. Quantitative data and qualitative data were analysed using repeated measures ANOVAs and thematic analysis, respectively. Results: The programme led to significant improvements in physical function, including increased six-minute walking distance (6MWT, p < 0.001), one-minute sit-to-stand repetitions (1MSST, p < 0.035), and lung function (spirometry; MIP: p = 0.048, MEP: p = 0.024). Participants also reported enhanced QoL (HRQoL-14, p = 0.004), reduced anxiety (GAD-7, p = 0.008) and depression (PHQ-9, p = 0.008), and increased confidence and self-efficacy. The programme was well-received, with participants valuing the supportive environment and personalised approach. Conclusions: Football community trust exercise rehabilitation programmes can effectively improve physical function and quality of life in individuals with PCC, offering a promising model for community-based rehabilitation. Further studies are needed with larger sample sizes to assess the scalability of similar programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Rimmer & Adam J. Herbert & Adam L. Kelly & Irfan Khawaja & Sam Lee & Lewis A. Gough, 2025. "A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Post-COVID-Condition Rehabilitation and Recovery Intervention Delivered in a Football Club Community Trust," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(11), pages 1-35, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:11:p:1672-:d:1787167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/11/1672/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/11/1672/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:11:p:1672-:d:1787167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.