IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i10p1601-d1776422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Forests and Public Health: A Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Pooja S. Tandon

    (Trust for Public Land, San Francisco, CA 94108, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
    Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
    School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA)

  • Shelby Semmes

    (Trust for Public Land, San Francisco, CA 94108, USA)

  • Kim Garrett

    (Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA)

  • Liv Ellerton

    (Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA)

  • Susan Charnley

    (College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
    U.S. Forest Service, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA)

  • Howard Frumkin

    (Trust for Public Land, San Francisco, CA 94108, USA
    School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
    School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77840, USA)

Abstract

The natural environment is integral to supporting healthy and resilient communities. Community forests (CFs) are forested parcels, typically in rural areas, where community members have access, share governance, and receive various benefits. While considerable research demonstrates that urban parks and forests are important for human health, similar assessments are less available for CFs specifically. Although CFs exist in multiple countries, their policy, ecological, ownership, and governance contexts differ significantly. This review focuses on CFs in the United States. The goals of this project were to systematically review current evidence on the relationship between CFs and human health, identify knowledge gaps in the existing research, and propose a scientific research agenda that identifies critical questions related to CFs and public health in the U.S., with application in other contexts. We conducted a systematic review of the literature, screening 351 studies and assessing twenty-four full-text articles, only one of which met inclusion criteria. This mixed-methods study characterized 70 CFs in the Eastern U.S. and featured four case studies. The majority of CFs (93%) and all case studies identified recreational use as their most common purpose. The evidence base on the health implications of CFs is very thin. Targeted research on CFs and their impact on health could provide evidence to inform CF processes and help optimize their health outcomes. We propose a research agenda on CFs in the U.S. based on several pathways of public health promotion: nature contact, climate mitigation/adaptation, economic opportunities, community cohesion, and equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Pooja S. Tandon & Shelby Semmes & Kim Garrett & Liv Ellerton & Susan Charnley & Howard Frumkin, 2025. "Community Forests and Public Health: A Research Agenda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(10), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:10:p:1601-:d:1776422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1601/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1601/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:10:p:1601-:d:1776422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.