IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i10p1577-d1773048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Zoonotic Disease Exposure and Occupational Health and Safety Practices Among Veterinary Services Fieldworkers in North West Province, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Sboniso Mhlongo

    (North West Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Veterinary Services, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa)

  • Nisha Naicker

    (Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa
    A Division of the National Health Laboratory Services, National Institute for Occupational Health, Braamfontein 2001, South Africa)

  • Tanusha Singh

    (Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein 2028, South Africa
    A Division of the National Health Laboratory Services, National Institute for Occupational Health, Braamfontein 2001, South Africa)

Abstract

Background: Veterinary fieldworkers play an important role in managing animal and public health risks, yet they face significant occupational hazards, particularly from zoonotic diseases. In South Africa’s North West Province, the occupational health and safety (OHS) of this workforce remains understudied. This study aimed to describe and characterize the OHS practices, zoonotic disease risk exposures, and contributing factors affecting veterinary services fieldworkers in the North West Province. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted among 137 veterinary fieldworkers, including animal health technicians, state veterinarians, and veterinary public health officers. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire focusing on sociodemographics, knowledge of zoonoses, exposure history, and OHS practices. Descriptive statistics were applied using SPSS version 27. Results: Fieldworkers frequently reported contact with animals, animal waste, and body fluids without consistent access to adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) or comprehensive training. While most were aware of common zoonoses such as rabies and brucellosis, less than half received regular OHS training or vaccinations. Significant associations were found between occupational category and reported PPE use, as well as between knowledge levels and years of experience. Conclusions: This study highlights critical gaps in knowledge of zoonotic disease, inconsistent implementation of safety protocols, and inadequate PPE provision and/or use among veterinary fieldworkers. These findings highlight the urgent need to strengthen occupational health frameworks, standardize training, and improve access to protective resources to safeguard both workers and broader public health.

Suggested Citation

  • Sboniso Mhlongo & Nisha Naicker & Tanusha Singh, 2025. "Assessing Zoonotic Disease Exposure and Occupational Health and Safety Practices Among Veterinary Services Fieldworkers in North West Province, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:10:p:1577-:d:1773048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1577/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1577/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:10:p:1577-:d:1773048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.