IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i10p1567-d1771700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Compliance with Evolving Exposure Standards: Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) Exposure in Western Australian Mining

Author

Listed:
  • Adelle Liebenberg

    (School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia)

  • Kiam Padamsey

    (School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia)

  • Kerry Staples

    (Department of Health (Western Australia), Epidemiology Directorate, Perth 6004, Australia)

  • Matthew Oosthuizen

    (School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia)

  • Marcus Cattani

    (School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia)

  • Andy McCarthy

    (School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia)

  • Jacques Oosthuizen

    (School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup 6028, Australia)

Abstract

The link between occupational exposure to Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) and silicosis, a potentially fatal respiratory disease, has been well-established, leading to global reductions in RCS Exposure Standards (ES). In Western Australia (WA), RCS data have been collected by the Department of Energy, Mining, Industry Regulation and Safety (DEMIRS) from 1986 to 2024 ( n = 144,141). These results were analysed to assess the impacts of recent changes to the ES on compliance. Findings suggest that the WA mining sector, regardless of commodity type, is compliant with RCS exposures as assessed against the 0.05 mg/m 3 ES (2019). Laboratory technicians, exploratory drilling, miscellaneous trades/utilities, trades assistant, sample preparation, and sampler/sample operator are SEGS that had the highest RCS exposures. Exposure assessment did not account for the protection provided by respiratory protective equipment (RPE). In the WA mining sector, a robust respiratory protection regime is enforced that includes respirator fit testing, and this is most likely the case throughout Australia. On the balance of epidemiological evidence, industry compliance over decades, reducing exposure profiles, and robust RPE programmes, it could be argued that further reductions to the RCS exposure standard are not justified. Regulators need to consider the protection provided by respirators in exposure assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Adelle Liebenberg & Kiam Padamsey & Kerry Staples & Matthew Oosthuizen & Marcus Cattani & Andy McCarthy & Jacques Oosthuizen, 2025. "Assessing Compliance with Evolving Exposure Standards: Respirable Crystalline Silica (RCS) Exposure in Western Australian Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(10), pages 1-8, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:10:p:1567-:d:1771700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:10:p:1567-:d:1771700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.