IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i10p1516-d1763707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comprehensive Assessment of Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Emergency Preparedness and Crisis Response for Ohio’s Resettled Communities: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Knowledge, Barriers, and Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Isha Karmacharya

    (Department of Sociology and Gerontology and Scripps Gerontology Center, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA)

  • Surendra Bir Adhikari

    (Ohio Department of Mental Health & Addiction Services, Columbus, OH 43215, USA)

  • Elizabeth Poprocki

    (Ohio Department of Mental Health & Addiction Services, Columbus, OH 43215, USA)

  • Mary Neely Young

    (Department of Kinesiology, Nutrition, & Health, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA)

  • Shuayb Jama

    (Ethiopian Tewahedo Social Services, Columbus, OH 43213, USA)

  • Denise Martin

    (Ethiopian Tewahedo Social Services, Columbus, OH 43213, USA)

  • Seleshi Ayalew Asfaw

    (Ethiopian Tewahedo Social Services, Columbus, OH 43213, USA)

  • Saruna Ghimire

    (Department of Sociology and Gerontology and Scripps Gerontology Center, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA)

Abstract

This study evaluated emergency preparedness, covering knowledge, challenges, and culturally and linguistically appropriate resources among five resettled refugee communities in Central Ohio: Afghan, Bhutanese, Congolese, Ethiopian/Eritrean, and Somali. It also explored youth perceptions of community engagement and the effectiveness of current crisis support initiatives. A mixed-methods approach was used, consisting of a cross-sectional quantitative survey of 266 adults and a qualitative 60-min focus group discussion with 10 youth from the resettled communities. Quantitative data was analyzed with descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests assessing differences in preparedness across communities. Quantitative findings showed that the Bhutanese group reported the highest familiarity with preparedness concepts (33.3%), while Afghan and Congolese communities showed significant gaps. Of the 266 overall respondents, only 39.5% had an emergency plan, and 15.8% felt extremely confident in handling emergencies. Language barriers were major challenges, along with those related to race and ethnic identity, religious practices, and cultural norms. Effective platforms for engagement included community meetings, religious sites, and social media, with text messages and phone calls preferred for emergency communication. Youth discussion highlighted key public health concerns, particularly gun violence, substance abuse, and mental health crises, with stigma and limited resources further hindering preparedness efforts. Participants emphasized the need for culturally relevant interventions and stronger community engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Isha Karmacharya & Surendra Bir Adhikari & Elizabeth Poprocki & Mary Neely Young & Shuayb Jama & Denise Martin & Seleshi Ayalew Asfaw & Saruna Ghimire, 2025. "A Comprehensive Assessment of Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Emergency Preparedness and Crisis Response for Ohio’s Resettled Communities: A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Knowledge, Barriers, ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(10), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:10:p:1516-:d:1763707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1516/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1516/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:10:p:1516-:d:1763707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.