IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i10p1464-d1755839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Burden of Lip and Oral Cavity Cancer Among Women Across 204 Countries and Territories in the Context of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Laila Menezes Hagen

    (Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80210-170, Brazil)

  • Larissa Rodrigues Gasparini

    (Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80210-170, Brazil)

  • Bruna Machado da Silva

    (Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80210-170, Brazil)

  • Amanda Ramos da Cunha

    (Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-904, Brazil)

  • Fernando Neves Hugo

    (Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA)

  • José Miguel Amenábar

    (Department of Stomatology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80210-170, Brazil)

Abstract

Background: Historically, lip and oral cavity cancer (LOC) has been more prevalent among men, largely due to higher tobacco use in this group. However, over the past decades, smoking rates among women have risen and, in some regions, are approaching those of men. This shift highlights the urgent need to analyze the burden of LOC specifically in women, as they may respond differently to tobacco control policies. This study assessed whether the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO-FCTC), launched in 2003, and the implementation of MPOWER measures have influenced LOC trends among women. Methods: A controlled interrupted time series was conducted from 1990 to 2021, with the launch of the WHO-FCTC considered the intervention point. A total of 204 countries and territories were initially categorized into two groups: those without (G1) and with (G2) MPOWER coverage. G2 was further subdivided based on the median MPOWER score from 2007 to 2020 into G2A (equal to or below the median) and G2B (above the median). Analyses were also stratified by Socio-Demographic Index (SDI) levels. Female LOC rates were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Prais-Winsten segmented regression was applied to estimate annual percent changes (APCs) in LOC rates before and after the WHO-FCTC. Results: Prior to the WHO-FCTC, most trends for G1 and G2A were stable, while all trends for G2B were increasing. After 2003, LOC rates increased across all groups, especially in G2B. In high-SDI settings, rising trends in G2B remained unchanged post-intervention, whereas G1 and G2A shifted from stable to increasing. Among low-SDI groups, slopes were mostly not statistically significant. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the WHO-FCTC has had no measurable impact on reducing LOC burden among women so far. Instead, rates have continued to rise in many regions, signaling a concerning trend for women’s global health.

Suggested Citation

  • Laila Menezes Hagen & Larissa Rodrigues Gasparini & Bruna Machado da Silva & Amanda Ramos da Cunha & Fernando Neves Hugo & José Miguel Amenábar, 2025. "The Burden of Lip and Oral Cavity Cancer Among Women Across 204 Countries and Territories in the Context of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(10), pages 1-11, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:10:p:1464-:d:1755839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1464/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/10/1464/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:10:p:1464-:d:1755839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.