IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i6p663-d1399731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk and Protective Factors for Injury in Adult Front- and Rear-Seated Motor Vehicle Occupants in New York State

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Zhang

    (New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Occupational Health and Injury Prevention, Empire State Plaza, Corning Tower, Albany, NY 12237, USA)

  • Emilia Pawlowski

    (New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Occupational Health and Injury Prevention, Empire State Plaza, Corning Tower, Albany, NY 12237, USA)

  • Leah M. Hines

    (New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Occupational Health and Injury Prevention, Empire State Plaza, Corning Tower, Albany, NY 12237, USA)

  • Michael J. Bauer

    (New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Occupational Health and Injury Prevention, Empire State Plaza, Corning Tower, Albany, NY 12237, USA)

  • Joyce C. Pressley

    (Departments of Epidemiology, Health Policy and Management, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA)

Abstract

Although seatbelt use is known to reduce motor vehicle occupant crash injury and death, rear-seated adult occupants are less likely to use restraints. This study examines risk and protective factors associated with injury severity in front- and rear-seated adults involved in a motor vehicle crash in New York State. The Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES) (2016–2017) was used to examine injury severity in front- and rear-seated occupants aged 18 years or older ( N = 958,704) involved in a motor vehicle crash. CODES uses probabilistic linkage of New York State hospitalization, emergency department, and police and motorist crash reports. Multivariable logistic regression models with MI analyze employed SAS 9.4. Odds ratios are reported as OR with 95% CI. The mortality rate was approximately 1.5 times higher for rear-seated than front-seated occupants (136.60 vs. 92.45 per 100,000), with rear-seated occupants more frequently unrestrained than front-seated occupants (15.28% vs. 1.70%, p < 0.0001). In adjusted analyses that did not include restraint status, serious injury/death was higher in rear-seated compared to front-seated occupants (OR:1.272, 1.146–1.412), but lower once restraint use was added (OR: 0.851, 0.771–0.939). Unrestrained rear-seated occupants exhibited higher serious injury/death than restrained front-seated occupants. Unrestrained teens aged 18–19 years old exhibit mortality per 100,000 occupants that is more similar to that of the oldest two age groups than to other young and middle-aged adults. Speeding, a drinking driver, and older vehicles were among the independent predictors of serious injury/death. Unrestrained rear-seated adult occupants exhibit higher severe injury/death than restrained front-seated occupants. When restrained, rear-seated occupants are less likely to be seriously injured than restrained front-seated occupants.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Zhang & Emilia Pawlowski & Leah M. Hines & Michael J. Bauer & Joyce C. Pressley, 2024. "Risk and Protective Factors for Injury in Adult Front- and Rear-Seated Motor Vehicle Occupants in New York State," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:663-:d:1399731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/663/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/663/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:663-:d:1399731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.