IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i6p654-d1398860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Risk of Aircraft-Acquired SARS-CoV-2 Transmission during Commercial Flights: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Zhao

    (Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Stephanie Cheng

    (Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Fuchiang R. Tsui

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19146, USA)

  • Maya B. Mathur

    (Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)

  • Chih-Hung Jason Wang

    (Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
    Center for Health Policy, Freeman-Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)

Abstract

The aircraft-acquired transmission of SARS-CoV-2 poses a public health risk. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and analysis of articles, published prior to vaccines being available, from 24 January 2020 to 20 April 2021 to identify factors important for transmission. Articles were included if they mentioned index cases and identifiable flight duration, and excluded if they discussed non-commercial aircraft, airflow or transmission models, cases without flight data, or that were unable to determine in-flight transmission. From the 15 articles selected for in-depth review, 50 total flights were analyzed by flight duration both as a categorical variable—short (<3 h), medium (3–6 h), or long flights (>6 h)—and as a continuous variable with case counts modeled by negative binomial regression. Compared to short flights without masking, medium and long flights without masking were associated with 4.66-fold increase (95% CI: [1.01, 21.52]; p < 0.0001) and 25.93-fold increase in incidence rates (95% CI: [4.1, 164]; p < 0.0001), respectively; long flights with enforced masking had no transmission reported. A 1 h increase in flight duration was associated with 1.53-fold (95% CI: [1.19, 1.66]; p < 0.001) increase in the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of cases. Masking should be considered for long flights.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Zhao & Stephanie Cheng & Fuchiang R. Tsui & Maya B. Mathur & Chih-Hung Jason Wang, 2024. "The Risk of Aircraft-Acquired SARS-CoV-2 Transmission during Commercial Flights: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-11, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:654-:d:1398860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/654/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/6/654/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:6:p:654-:d:1398860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.