IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i5p526-d1381827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilisation of Reproductive Health Services among Adolescents in Ghana: Analysis of the 2007 and 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • James Tetteh-Boawolor Ehiawey

    (Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra P.O. Box LG 13, Ghana)

  • Adom Manu

    (Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra P.O. Box LG 13, Ghana)

  • Emefa Modey

    (Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra P.O. Box LG 13, Ghana)

  • Deda Ogum

    (Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra P.O. Box LG 13, Ghana)

  • Edgar Atuhaire

    (Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra P.O. Box LG 13, Ghana)

  • Kwasi Torpey

    (Department of Population Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra P.O. Box LG 13, Ghana)

Abstract

Early pubertal development induces early sexual activities among adolescents. In Ghana, despite the high sexual activity among Ghanaian adolescents, sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services are underutilised, primarily due to SRH stigma and a lack of SRH knowledge and information. This study examined the use of SRH services among adolescents aged 15–19 years in Ghana over a ten year period. The study utilised data from the 2007 and 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Surveys (GMHSs). Responses from 2056 and 4909 adolescent females captured in the 2007 and 2017 GMHSs, respectively, were used. The results showed a declining utilisation of SRH services among adolescents from 28.3% in 2007 to 22.5% in 2017. The odds of using family planning among sexually active adolescents increased from 2007 [AOR-0.32, CI-(0.135, 0.77), p < 0.001] to 2017 [AOR-68.62, CI-(36.104, 130.404), p < 0.001]. With increasing age at first sex, adolescents were less likely to use a family planning method in 2007 [AOR-0.94, CI-(0.89,0.99) p < 0.001], but this improved in 2017 [AOR-1.26, CI-(1.220, 1.293), p < 0.001]. Despite this, knowledge of sources for family planning was found to predict its lower utilisation in both 2007 [AOR = 0.15 (95% CI-0.081, 0.283), p < 0.0001] and 2017 [AOR = 0.206 (95% CI-(0.099, 0.426), p < 0.001]. The findings show that even though knowledge of family planning methods predicted low utilisation, knowledge of sources, age at first sex, and educational level positively predicted the utilisation of SRH services from 2007 to 2017. Opportunities for both enhancing the clinical environment and health provider attitudes exist and should be explored for improving SRH outcomes among sexually active adolescents in Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • James Tetteh-Boawolor Ehiawey & Adom Manu & Emefa Modey & Deda Ogum & Edgar Atuhaire & Kwasi Torpey, 2024. "Utilisation of Reproductive Health Services among Adolescents in Ghana: Analysis of the 2007 and 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Surveys," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(5), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:5:p:526-:d:1381827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/5/526/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/5/526/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:5:p:526-:d:1381827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.