IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i3p296-d1350615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Australian Women’s Experiences of Establishing Breastfeeding after Caesarean Birth

Author

Listed:
  • Sharon L. Perrella

    (School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
    ABREAST Network, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
    UWA Centre for Human Lactation Research and Translation, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia)

  • Sarah G. Abelha

    (School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
    Western Obstetrics, Balcatta, WA 6021, Australia)

  • Philip Vlaskovsky

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia)

  • Jacki L. McEachran

    (School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
    ABREAST Network, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
    UWA Centre for Human Lactation Research and Translation, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia)

  • Stuart A. Prosser

    (School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
    Western Obstetrics, Balcatta, WA 6021, Australia)

  • Donna T. Geddes

    (School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
    ABREAST Network, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
    UWA Centre for Human Lactation Research and Translation, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia)

Abstract

Breastfeeding exclusivity and duration rates are lower after caesarean birth, yet the factors contributing to these are not well understood. This mixed-methods study used an anonymous online questionnaire to examine the facilitators and barriers to establishing breastfeeding as identified by Australian women after a caesarean birth. Quantitative data were reported using descriptive statistics, and multivariable models were used to determine the factors associated with breastfeeding outcomes including the timing of breastfeeding initiation, birth experience, and commercial infant formula use. Qualitative data were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis. Data were obtained for N = 961 women, of which <50% reported skin-to-skin contact during breastfeeding initiation. The barriers to breastfeeding included aspects of clinical care and reduced mobility, while unrushed care, partner support, and physical help with picking up the baby were helpful. Following a non-elective caesarean birth, women had half the odds of early breastfeeding initiation (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.68; p ≤ 0.001) and 10 times the odds to report a negative birth experience (OR = 10.2; 95% CI: 6.88, 15.43; p < 0.001). Commercial milk formula use was higher in primiparous women (OR = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.60, 2.91; p < 0.001) and in those that birthed in a private hospital (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.25, 2.32; p = 0.001). Pain and reduced mobility, as well as conflicting and rushed care, negatively impacted breastfeeding after a caesarean birth, while delayed breastfeeding initiation, higher pain ratings, and negative birth experiences were more common for women that birthed by non-elective caesarean. This study adds valuable insights into the physical, emotional, and clinical care needs of women in establishing breastfeeding after a surgical birth. Clinical staffing and care should be modified to include full access to partner support to meet the specific needs of breastfeeding women after a caesarean birth.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharon L. Perrella & Sarah G. Abelha & Philip Vlaskovsky & Jacki L. McEachran & Stuart A. Prosser & Donna T. Geddes, 2024. "Australian Women’s Experiences of Establishing Breastfeeding after Caesarean Birth," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:3:p:296-:d:1350615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/3/296/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/3/296/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:3:p:296-:d:1350615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.