Author
Listed:
- Davi Oliveira Teles
(Nursing Graduate Program, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-160, Brazil)
- Raquel Alves de Oliveira
(Nursing Graduate Program, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-160, Brazil)
- Anna Luísa de Oliveira Parnaíba
(Programa de Educação Tutorial (PET), Nursing Department, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-160, Brazil)
- Mariana Araújo Rios
(Programa de Educação Tutorial (PET), Nursing Department, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-160, Brazil)
- Melissa Bezerra Machado
(Programa de Educação Tutorial (PET), Nursing Department, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-160, Brazil)
- Priscila de Souza Aquino
(Nursing Graduate Program, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-160, Brazil)
- Purdenciana Ribeiro de Menezes
(Nursing Graduate Program, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-160, Brazil)
- Samila Gomes Ribeiro
(Nursing Graduate Program, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-160, Brazil)
- Paula Renata Amorim Lessa Soares
(Nursing Graduate Program, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-160, Brazil)
- Camila Biazus Dalcin
(School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK)
- Ana Karina Bezerra Pinheiro
(Nursing Graduate Program, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60430-160, Brazil)
Abstract
Objective: The objective was to identify validated instruments from the literature that assess the mental health of police officers. Methods: This is a systematic review of validated instruments used to assess the mental health of police officers. Searches were conducted in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL/EBSCO, and Virtual Health Library databases. This review follows the JBI Manual for Systematic Reviews and the PRISMA statement. The methodological quality of the articles and the risk of bias were assessed. Results: A total of 1530 studies were identified across the six databases, with 158 studies read in full by the authors after excluding duplicates and those that did not meet the inclusion criteria. The final 29 studies were analyzed for methodological quality and risk of bias using the AXIS and SFS-D tools. Conclusion: This review identified 27 self-administered validated instruments useful for assessing various mental health outcomes in police officers, with the most frequently used being the Police Stress Questionnaire. These findings may help guide security force administration, occupational health professionals, and mental health researchers in selecting and implementing psychometrically reliable instruments for screening the mental health of police officers.
Suggested Citation
Davi Oliveira Teles & Raquel Alves de Oliveira & Anna Luísa de Oliveira Parnaíba & Mariana Araújo Rios & Melissa Bezerra Machado & Priscila de Souza Aquino & Purdenciana Ribeiro de Menezes & Samila Go, 2024.
"Assessment of the Mental Health of Police Officers: A Systematic Review of Specific Instruments,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-19, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1300-:d:1488325
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Alexandra Marcos & Cristina García-Ael & Gabriela Topa, 2020.
"The Influence of Work Resources, Demands, and Organizational Culture on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and Citizenship Behaviors of Spanish Police Officers,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1300-:d:1488325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.