IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i9p5643-d1132903.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Group-Based Patterns of Life Satisfaction and Functional Independence over the 10 Years after Traumatic Brain Injury in Older Adults: A Model Systems Study

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen M. Tyler

    (Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA)

  • Mia E. Dini

    (Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
    Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center TBI Model Systems, Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA 23249, USA)

  • Paul B. Perrin

    (Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
    Polytrauma Rehabilitation Center TBI Model Systems, Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA 23249, USA
    School of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA)

Abstract

Background: Older adults who sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been shown to have reduced functional independence and life satisfaction relative to younger individuals with TBI. The purpose of this study was to examine the covarying patterns of functional independence and life satisfaction over the 10 years after TBI in adults who were 60 years of age or older upon injury. Method: Participants were 1841 individuals aged 60 or older at the time of TBI, were enrolled in the longitudinal TBI Model Systems database, and had Functional Independence Measure and Satisfaction with Life Scale scores during at least one time point at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after TBI. Results: A k -means cluster analysis identified four distinct group-based longitudinal patterns of these two variables. Three cluster groups suggested that functional independence and life satisfaction generally traveled together over time, with one group showing relatively high functional independence and life satisfaction over time (Cluster 2), one group showing relatively moderate functional independence and life satisfaction (Cluster 4), and one group showing relatively low functional independence and life satisfaction (Cluster 1). Cluster 3 had relatively high functional independence over time but, nonetheless, relatively low life satisfaction; they were also the youngest group upon injury. Participants in Cluster 2 generally had the highest number of weeks of paid competitive employment but lower percentages of underrepresented racial/ethnic minority participants, particularly Black and Hispanic individuals. Women were more likely to be in the cluster with the lowest life satisfaction and functional independence (Cluster 1). Conclusion: Functional independence and life satisfaction generally accompany one another over time in older adults, although this does not always occur, as life satisfaction can still be low in a subgroup of older individuals after TBI with higher functioning. These findings contribute to a better understanding of post-TBI recovery patterns in older adults over time that may inform treatment considerations to improve age-related discrepancies in rehabilitation outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen M. Tyler & Mia E. Dini & Paul B. Perrin, 2023. "Group-Based Patterns of Life Satisfaction and Functional Independence over the 10 Years after Traumatic Brain Injury in Older Adults: A Model Systems Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5643-:d:1132903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5643/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5643/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5643-:d:1132903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.