IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i9p5636-d1132354.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inter-Examiner and Intra-Examiner Reliability of Quantitative and Qualitative Ultrasonography Assessment of Peripheral and Respiratory Muscles in Critically Ill Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Felipe Douglas Silva Barbosa

    (Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju 49060-100, Brazil
    Family Health and Occupational Therapy Department, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40026-010, Brazil)

  • José Lucas Dos Santos

    (University Hospital of Lagarto, Federal University of Sergipe, Lagarto 49400-000, Brazil)

  • Maria Emilia Dantas Alves

    (Multiprofessional Integrated Residency Program in Hospital Care, University Hospital of Lagarto, Federal University of Sergipe, Lagarto 49400-000, Brazil)

  • Juliana de Ávila Barreto Alves

    (University Hospital of Lagarto, Federal University of Sergipe, Lagarto 49400-000, Brazil)

  • Telma Cristina Fontes Cerqueira

    (Department of Physiotherapy of Lagarto, Federal University of Sergipe, Lagarto 49400-000, Brazil)

  • Valter Joviniano De Santana Filho

    (Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju 49060-100, Brazil
    Department of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristovão 49100-000, Brazil)

Abstract

ICU patients are exposed to several factors that can lead to muscle structural and functional changes, and ultrasonography can identify them. Although several studies have analyzed the reliability of muscle ultrasonography assessment, a protocol with more muscle assessments becomes a challenge. The aim of this study was to analyze the inter and intra-examiner reliability of peripheral and respiratory muscle ultrasonography assessment in critically ill patients. The sample size was 10 individuals aged ≥ 18 years who were admitted to the ICU. Practical training of four health professionals from different backgrounds was performed. After training, each examiner acquired three images to assess the thickness and echogenicity of the muscle groups: biceps brachii, forearm flexor group, quadriceps femoris, tibialis anterior and diaphragm. For the reliability analysis, an intraclass correlation coefficient was performed. Six hundred US images were analyzed for muscle thickness and 150 for echogenicity. Excellent intra-examiner reliability for echogenicity (ICC: 0.867–0.973) and inter-examiner reliability for thickness were found in all muscle groups (ICC: 0.778–0.942). For muscle thickness intra-examiner reliability, excellent results were found (ICC: 0.798–0.988), with a “good” correlation in one diaphragm assessment (ICC: 0.718). Excellent inter- and intra-examiner reliability of the thickness assessment and intra-examiner echogenicity of all muscles analyzed were found.

Suggested Citation

  • Felipe Douglas Silva Barbosa & José Lucas Dos Santos & Maria Emilia Dantas Alves & Juliana de Ávila Barreto Alves & Telma Cristina Fontes Cerqueira & Valter Joviniano De Santana Filho, 2023. "Inter-Examiner and Intra-Examiner Reliability of Quantitative and Qualitative Ultrasonography Assessment of Peripheral and Respiratory Muscles in Critically Ill Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5636-:d:1132354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5636/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5636/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5636-:d:1132354. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.