IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i9p5611-d1130476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management of Low Back Pain: Do Physiotherapists Know the Evidence-Based Guidelines?

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Fourré

    (Department of Neurosciences, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, 7000 Mons, Belgium
    Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium)

  • Rob Vanderstraeten

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium)

  • Laurence Ris

    (Department of Neurosciences, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, 7000 Mons, Belgium)

  • Hilde Bastiaens

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium)

  • Jozef Michielsen

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium
    Orthopedic Department, University Hospital, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Christophe Demoulin

    (Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium)

  • Ben Darlow

    (Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington 6021, New Zealand)

  • Nathalie Roussel

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium)

Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines promote bio-psychosocial management of patients suffering from low back pain (LBP). The objective of this study was to examine the current knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of physiotherapists about a guideline-adherent approach to LBP and to assess the ability of physiotherapists to recognise signs of a specific LBP in a clinical vignette. Methods: Physiotherapists were recruited to participate in an online study. They were asked to indicate whether they were familiar with evidence-based guidelines and then to fill in the Health Care Providers’ Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS), Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire (Back-PAQ), Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ), as well as questions related to two clinical vignettes. Results: In total, 527 physiotherapists participated in this study. Only 38% reported being familiar with guidelines for the management of LBP. Sixty-three percent of the physiotherapists gave guideline-inconsistent recommendations regarding work. Only half of the physiotherapists recognised the signs of a specific LBP. Conclusions: The high proportion of physiotherapists unfamiliar with guidelines and demonstrating attitudes and beliefs not in line with evidence-based management of LBP is concerning. It is crucial to develop efficient strategies to enhance knowledge of guidelines among physiotherapists and increase their implementation in clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Fourré & Rob Vanderstraeten & Laurence Ris & Hilde Bastiaens & Jozef Michielsen & Christophe Demoulin & Ben Darlow & Nathalie Roussel, 2023. "Management of Low Back Pain: Do Physiotherapists Know the Evidence-Based Guidelines?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5611-:d:1130476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5611/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5611/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5611-:d:1130476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.