IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i8p5513-d1123455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of Patient-Centered Care by Athletic Training Students during Clinical Experiences: A Report from the Association of Athletic Training Education Research Network

Author

Listed:
  • Julie M. Cavallario

    (School of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Bonnie L. Van Lunen

    (College of Health Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Stacy E. Walker

    (School of Kinesiology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • R. Curtis Bay

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Arizona School of Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Cailee E. Welch Bacon

    (Department of Athletic Training, Arizona School of Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA
    Department of Basic Medical Science, School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona, A.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ 85206, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Patient-centered care (PCC) is a core competency that should be required by all healthcare education programs, but little is known about its implementation in athletic training clinical experiences. Therefore, we examined characteristics of patient encounters documented by athletic training students implementing PCC behaviors. A multisite panel design was used to recruit 363 students from twelve professional athletic training programs (five undergraduate, seven graduate). Over 1.5 years, clinical experience patient encounter data were logged in E*Value Case Logs, including student role during the encounter, length of encounter, and clinical site. Generalized estimating equations models characterized the likelihood students included PCC behaviors in 30,522 encounters. Discussing patient goals was associated with student role (χ 2 (2) = 40.6, p < 0.001) and length of encounter (χ 2 (4) = 67.6, p < 0.001). Using patient-reported outcome measures was associated with student role (χ 2 (2) = 21.6, p < 0.001), length of encounter (χ 2 (4) = 34.5, p < 0.001), and clinical site (χ 2 (3) = 17.3, p = 0.001). Implementing clinician-rated outcome measures was affected by length of encounter (χ 2 (4) = 27.9, p < 0.001) and clinical site (χ 2 (3) = 8.6, p = 0.04). PCC behaviors were largely associated with student role and length of encounters; clinical site had less impact. Athletic training educators should emphasize progressive autonomous supervision with preceptors and encourage students to facilitate slightly longer patient visits, when possible, to incorporate more PCC behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie M. Cavallario & Bonnie L. Van Lunen & Stacy E. Walker & R. Curtis Bay & Cailee E. Welch Bacon, 2023. "Implementation of Patient-Centered Care by Athletic Training Students during Clinical Experiences: A Report from the Association of Athletic Training Education Research Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:8:p:5513-:d:1123455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/8/5513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/8/5513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:8:p:5513-:d:1123455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.