IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i8p5459-d1120490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Self-Assessment of Exposure to Solvents among Formal and Informal Nail Technicians in Johannesburg, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Derk Brouwer

    (School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa)

  • Goitsemang Keretetse

    (School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa)

  • Gill Nelson

    (School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa)

Abstract

Participatory research, including self-assessment of exposure (SAE), can engage study participants and reduce costs. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility and reliability of a SAE regime among nail technicians. The study was nested in a larger study, which included exposure assessment supervised by experts, i.e., controlled assessment of exposure (CAE). In the SAE approach, ten formal and ten informal nail technicians were verbally instructed to use a passive sampler and complete an activity sheet. Each participant conducted measurements on three consecutive days, whereafter the expert collected the passive samplers. Sixty samples were, thus, analyzed for twenty-one volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The reported concentrations of 11 VOCs were converted into total VOC (TVOC) concentrations, adjusted for their respective emission rates (adj TVOC) to allow comparison within and between nail technician categories (formal vs informal), as well as assessment regimes (SAE versus CAE), using the data from the main study. In total, 57 SAE and 58 CAE results were compared, using a linear mixed-effects model. There were variations in individual VOC concentrations, especially for the informal sector participants. The major contributors to the adj TVOC concentrations were acetone and 2-propanol for the formal category, whereas ethyl- and methyl methacrylate contributed most to the informal nail technicians’ total exposures. No significant differences in adj TVOC-concentrations were observed between the assessment regimes, but significantly higher exposures were recorded in the formal technicians. The results show that the SAE approach is feasible in the informal service sector and can extend an exposure dataset to enable reliable estimates for scenarios with substantial exposure variations.

Suggested Citation

  • Derk Brouwer & Goitsemang Keretetse & Gill Nelson, 2023. "Quantitative Self-Assessment of Exposure to Solvents among Formal and Informal Nail Technicians in Johannesburg, South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:8:p:5459-:d:1120490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/8/5459/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/8/5459/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miyuki Noguchi & Atsushi Mizukoshi & Yukio Yanagisawa & Akihiro Yamasaki, 2016. "Measurements of Volatile Organic Compounds in a Newly Built Daycare Center," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed A. Eltarkawe & Shelly L. Miller, 2018. "The Impact of Industrial Odors on the Subjective Well-Being of Communities in Colorado," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Norimichi Suzuki & Hiroko Nakaoka & Masamichi Hanazato & Yoshitake Nakayama & Kayo Tsumura & Kazunari Takaya & Emiko Todaka & Chisato Mori, 2019. "Indoor Air Quality Analysis of Newly Built Houses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-11, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:8:p:5459-:d:1120490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.