IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i7p5378-d1114944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aligning Federated Learning with Existing Trust Structures in Health Care Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Imrana Yari Abdullahi

    (Machine Learning and Data Analytics (MaD) Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

  • René Raab

    (Machine Learning and Data Analytics (MaD) Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Arne Küderle

    (Machine Learning and Data Analytics (MaD) Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

  • Björn Eskofier

    (Machine Learning and Data Analytics (MaD) Lab, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering (AIBE), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany)

Abstract

Patient-centered health care information systems (PHSs) on peer-to-peer (P2P) networks (e.g., decentralized personal health records) enable storing data locally at the edge to enhance data sovereignty and resilience to single points of failure. Nonetheless, these systems raise concerns on trust and adoption in medical workflow due to non-alignment to current health care processes and stakeholders’ needs. The distributed nature of the data makes it more challenging to train and deploy machine learning models (using traditional methods) at the edge, for instance, for disease prediction. Federated learning (FL) has been proposed as a possible solution to these limitations. However, the P2P PHS architecture challenges current FL solutions because they use centralized engines (or random entities that could pose privacy concerns) for model update aggregation. Consequently, we propose a novel conceptual FL framework, CareNetFL, that is suitable for P2P PHS multi-tier and hybrid architecture and leverages existing trust structures in health care systems to ensure scalability, trust, and security. Entrusted parties (practitioners’ nodes) are used in CareNetFL to aggregate local model updates in the network hierarchy for their patients instead of random entities that could actively become malicious. Involving practitioners in their patients’ FL model training increases trust and eases access to medical data. The proposed concepts mitigate communication latency and improve FL performance through patient–practitioner clustering, reducing skewed and imbalanced data distributions and system heterogeneity challenges of FL at the edge. The framework also ensures end-to-end security and accountability through leveraging identity-based systems and privacy-preserving techniques that only guarantee security during training.

Suggested Citation

  • Imrana Yari Abdullahi & René Raab & Arne Küderle & Björn Eskofier, 2023. "Aligning Federated Learning with Existing Trust Structures in Health Care Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:7:p:5378-:d:1114944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/7/5378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/7/5378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:7:p:5378-:d:1114944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.