IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i7p5357-d1113093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defensins of Lucilia sericata Larvae and Their Influence on Wound Repair Processes in Practical Assessment—A Study of Three Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Dariusz Bazaliński

    (Father B. Markiewicz Podkarpackie Specialist Oncology Centre, Specialist Hospital in Brzozów, 36-200 Brzozów, Poland
    Department of Nursing and Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Joanna Przybek-Mita

    (Department of Medical Rescue, Institute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
    Postgraduate Nursing and Midwifery Education Centre, 35-083 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Lisowicz

    (Department of Nursing, Institute of Health and Economy, Carpathian State University in Krosno, 38-400 Krosno, Poland)

  • Mateusz Skórka

    (St Hedvig Clinical Provincial Hospital No. 2 in Rzeszów, 35-301 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Paweł Więch

    (Department of Nursing and Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
    Department of Nursing, Institute of Health Protection, State University of Applied Sciences in Przemyśl, 37-700 Przemyśl, Poland)

Abstract

Bacteria inhabiting chronic wounds form a biofilm that prolongs and slows down the healing process. Increasingly common antibiotic resistance requires clinicians to search for effective and alternative treatment methods. Defensins are the most common antimicrobial peptides capable of eradicating pathogens. Their discovery in maggot secretions allowed for a broader understanding of the healing mechanisms, and approving the use of Lucilia sericata fly larvae in the treatment of infected wounds resulted in an effective and safe procedure. The aim of the study was to present the possibility of biofilm elimination in a chronic wound by means of medical maggots ( Lucilia sericata ) with the example of three selected clinical cases. The observation included three women who met the inclusion criterion of having venous insufficiency ulcers with inhibited regeneration processes. Medical maggots were applied in a biobag for three days, and observation was conducted for 21 consecutive days. In 2 cases, a significant elimination of necrotic tissue from the wound bed with local granulation tissue was observed 72 h after application of a larvae colony on the wounds. In 1 case, the application of the larvae accelerated the repair process by reducing the wound area by approximately 40% at the time of observation. The formation of biofilm in a chronic wound is one of the main causes of disturbances in its effective healing. Combining procedures (scraping, antiseptic compresses, MDT, NPWT) related to wound debridement increases the effectiveness of biofilm elimination. The use of medical maggots is a safe and effective method of choice, and it enhances the processes of debridement. However, confirmed indisputable data on their effectiveness and frequency of use in the process of stimulating healing processes are still not available in the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariusz Bazaliński & Joanna Przybek-Mita & Katarzyna Lisowicz & Mateusz Skórka & Paweł Więch, 2023. "Defensins of Lucilia sericata Larvae and Their Influence on Wound Repair Processes in Practical Assessment—A Study of Three Cases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:7:p:5357-:d:1113093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/7/5357/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/7/5357/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myriam Le Goff-Pronost & Bénédicte Mourgeon & Jean-Pierre Blanchère & Luc Téot & Hervé Benateau & Anne Dompmartin, 2018. "Real-world clinical evaluation and costs of telemedicine for chronic wound management," Post-Print hal-01959362, HAL.
    2. Mohd Zurairie Mohd Zubir & Samantha Holloway & Norhayati Mohd Noor, 2020. "Maggot Therapy in Wound Healing: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Brain & Ruth Tulleners & Xing Lee & Qinglu Cheng & Nicholas Graves & Rosana Pacella, 2019. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of an innovative model of care for chronic wounds patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Dariusz Bazaliński & Joanna Przybek Mita & Lucyna Ścisło & Paweł Więch, 2022. "Perception and Readiness to Undertake Maggot Debridement Therapy with the Use of Lucilia sericata Larvae in the Group of Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:7:p:5357-:d:1113093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.