IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i7p5264-d1108000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Perceptions of Flavored Waterpipe Smoking on Twitter

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Ramon Feliciano

    (Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14620, USA)

  • Dongmei Li

    (Department of Clinical and Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA)

  • Zidian Xie

    (Department of Clinical and Translational Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA)

Abstract

Waterpipe tobacco smoking has become increasingly popular in recent years, especially among youth. We aimed to understand longitudinal trends in the prevalence and user perception of waterpipes and their flavors on Twitter. We extracted waterpipe-related tweets from March 2021 to May 2022 using the Twitter Streaming API and classified them into promotional tweets and non-promotional tweets. We examined the longitudinal trends regarding the waterpipe flavors mentioned on Twitter and conducted sentiment analysis on each waterpipe flavor-related non-promotional tweet. Among over 1.3 million waterpipe-related tweets, 1,158,884 tweets were classified as non-promotional and 235,132 were classified as promotional. The most frequently mentioned waterpipe flavor groups were fruit (34%), sweets (17%), and beverages (15%) among all flavor-containing non-promotional tweets (17,746 tweets). The least mentioned flavor groups were tobacco (unflavored, 4%) and spices (2%). Sentiment analysis showed that among non-promotional waterpipe-related tweets, 39% were neutral, 36% were positive, and 23% were negative. The most preferred waterpipe flavors were fruit, mixed, and alcohol flavors. The least preferred flavor groups were tobacco and spice flavors. Our study provided valuable information on the prevalence of waterpipe flavors that can be used to support the future regulation of flavored waterpipe tobacco products given the nature of the current regulations on other flavored tobacco products.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Ramon Feliciano & Dongmei Li & Zidian Xie, 2023. "Public Perceptions of Flavored Waterpipe Smoking on Twitter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:7:p:5264-:d:1108000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/7/5264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/7/5264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    waterpipe; flavor; Twitter; smoking;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:7:p:5264-:d:1108000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.