IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p5227-d1104458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Courtney Jade Mitchell

    (Sport Performance Research in New Zealand (SPRINZ), AUT Millennium Institute, AUT University, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    Department of Sport and Recreation, Toi Ohomai Institute of Technology, Tauranga 3112, New Zealand)

  • John Cronin

    (Sport Performance Research in New Zealand (SPRINZ), AUT Millennium Institute, AUT University, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    Athlete Training and Health, 23910 Katy Freeway, Suite 101, Katy, TX 77494, USA)

Abstract

Objective: To understand the methodological approaches taken by various research groups and determine the kinematic variables that could consistently and reliably differentiate between concussed and non-concussed individuals. Methods: MEDLINE via PubMed, CINAHL Complete via EBSCO, EBSCOhost, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus were searched from inception until 31 December 2021, using key terms related to concussion, mild traumatic brain injury, gait, cognition and dual task. Studies that reported spatiotemporal kinematic outcomes were included. Data were extracted using a customised spreadsheet, including detailed information on participant characteristics, assessment protocols, equipment used, and outcomes. Results: Twenty-three studies involving 1030 participants met the inclusion criteria. Ten outcome measures were reported across these articles. Some metrics such as gait velocity and stride length may be promising but are limited by the status of the current research; the majority of the reported variables were not sensitive enough across technologies to consistently differentiate between concussed and non-concussed individuals. Understanding variable sensitivity was made more difficult given the absence of any reporting of reliability of the protocols and variables in the respective studies. Conclusion: Given the current status of the literature and the methodologies reviewed, there would seem little consensus on which gait parameters are best to determine return to play readiness after concussion. There is potential in this area for such technologies and protocols to be utilised as a tool for identifying and monitoring concussion; however, improving understanding of the variability and validity of technologies and protocols underpins the suggested directions of future research. Inertial measurement units appear to be the most promising technology in this aspect and should guide the focus of future research. Impact: Results of this study may have an impact on what technology is chosen and may be utilised to assist with concussion diagnosis and return to play protocols.

Suggested Citation

  • Courtney Jade Mitchell & John Cronin, 2023. "Methodological Critique of Concussive and Non-Concussive Dual Task Walking Assessments: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5227-:d:1104458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5227/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5227/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5227-:d:1104458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.