IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p5205-d1098543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between Burden, Quality of Life and Difficulties of Informal Primary Caregivers in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of the Contributions of Public Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Tania Gaspar

    (SPIC, Hei-Lab, Lusófona University, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal
    ISAMB, Medicine Faculty, Lisbon University, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Marta Raimundo

    (SPIC, Psychology and Life Sciences School, Lusófona University, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal
    Aventura Social Associação, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Sofia Borges de Sousa

    (SPIC, Psychology and Life Sciences School, Lusófona University, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal
    Aventura Social Associação, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Marta Barata

    (SPIC, Psychology and Life Sciences School, Lusófona University, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal
    Aventura Social Associação, 1649-026 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Tulia Cabrita

    (CLISSIS, Psychology Institute, Lusiada University, 1349-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

The study aimed to characterize and understand the difficulties experienced by informal caregivers from a bio-psychosocial and environmental perspective, taking into account the socio-demographic and health characteristics of the informal caregiver and the person cared for, quality of life, perceived burden, social support, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the informal caregiver and the person cared for. The participants were 371 informal primary caregivers, 80.9% female, aged between 25 and 85 years, mean 53.17 (SD = 11.45) years. Only 16.4% of the informal caregivers benefited from monitoring and training for informal caregiver skills; 34.8% received information on the rights of the person being cared for; 7.8% received advice or guidance on the rights and duties of the informal caregiver; 11.9% of the caregivers benefited from psychological support; and 5.7% participated in self-help groups. A convenience sample was used, and data were collected via an online questionnaire. The main findings show that the major difficulties experienced by caregivers are related to social constraints, the demands of caring, and the reactions of the person cared for. The results reveal that the burden of the main informal caregivers is explained by the level of education, quality of life, level of dependence of the person cared for, level of difficulties, and social support. The COVID-19 pandemic impacted caregiving by increasing the perceived difficulty of accessing support services, such as consultations, services, and support; causing distress feelings in the caregiver, such as, anxiety and worry; increasing the needs and symptoms of the person cared for; and increasing the degree of isolation, for both, the informal caregiver and the person cared for.

Suggested Citation

  • Tania Gaspar & Marta Raimundo & Sofia Borges de Sousa & Marta Barata & Tulia Cabrita, 2023. "Relationship between Burden, Quality of Life and Difficulties of Informal Primary Caregivers in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of the Contributions of Public Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5205-:d:1098543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5205/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5205/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tânia Gaspar & Teresa Paiva & Margarida Gaspar Matos, 2022. "Ecological Model Explaining the Psychosocial Adaptation to COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Sampaio & Susana Gaspar & César Fonseca & Manuel José Lopes & Teresa Paiva & Lara Guedes de Pinho, 2023. "Sleep Quality between Nurses and the General Population during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Portugal: What Are the Differences?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5205-:d:1098543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.