IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p5183-d1098163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Physical Exercise Enhance the Immune Response after Vaccination? A Systematic Review for Clinical Indications of COVID-19 Vaccine

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Barni

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • Elio Carrasco-Vega

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain)

  • Matteo Olivieri

    (IMT School for Advanced Studies, 55100 Lucca, Italy)

  • Alejandro Galán-Mercant

    (Institute of Biomedicine of Cádiz (INIBICA), 11009 Cádiz, Spain
    MOVE-IT Research Group, Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cádiz, 11009 Cádiz, Spain)

  • Serena Guiducci

    (Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Divisions of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology AOUC, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Felice Picariello

    (Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Manuel González-Sánchez

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain
    Institute of Biomedicine of Málaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain)

Abstract

Background: Stimulating protective immunity with vaccines appears to be the most promising option for providing widespread moderate to high protection against COVID-19 in people over the age of 18. Regular exercise improves the immune response, transmitting possible benefits against virus infections. The aim of this review is to study the effects of physical activity on vaccine injections, helping to develop new recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination campaigns. Methods: A comprehensive review of the existing literature was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The internal quality of the studies was assessed according to the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. The outcomes analyzed were antibody titer, the level of lymphocytes CD4, CD8, InterLeukin 6 (IL6), leukocytes level, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for overall pain rating, arm and forearm circumferences and volume of oxygen (VO2) peak. Results: Fourteen articles were selected for the analysis. The majority of studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) ( n = 8) and controlled trials (CT) ( n = 6). According to PEDro, the ‘fair’ category ( n = 7) was the most represented, followed by ‘good’ ( n = 6) and ‘excellent’ ( n = 1). Physical training showed a positive effect on antibody titers of the vaccine; yet, different variables seem to influence antibody titers: higher new vs. old antigen in the vaccine, higher in younger vs. older individuals, and higher in females vs. males. After exercise, when analyzing variables of direct response to the vaccine, such as the amount of CD4, IL-6 and leukocytes, higher levels were observed in the patients who performed physical exercise compared to the control group. In the same way, better results were observed in physiological variables such as VO2 and limb circumferences, or subjective variables such as pain, which showed better results than the control group. Conclusions: The immune response (antibody titers) depends on age, gender and the intensity of physical activity: long-term protocols at moderate intensity are the most recommended. All of these aspects also have to be carefully considered for the COVID-19 vaccination.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Barni & Elio Carrasco-Vega & Matteo Olivieri & Alejandro Galán-Mercant & Serena Guiducci & Felice Picariello & Manuel González-Sánchez, 2023. "Does Physical Exercise Enhance the Immune Response after Vaccination? A Systematic Review for Clinical Indications of COVID-19 Vaccine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5183-:d:1098163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5183/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5183/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5183-:d:1098163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.