IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i6p5117-d1096922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Ambiguous Loss Inventory Plus (ALI+): Introduction of a Measure of Psychological Reactions to the Disappearance of a Loved One

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Comtesse

    (Clinical and Biological Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, 85072 Eichstaett, Germany)

  • Clare Killikelly

    (Department of Psychiatry, University British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1, Canada)

  • Sophie M. C. Hengst

    (ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, 1112 XE Diemen, The Netherlands)

  • Lonneke I. M. Lenferink

    (Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands
    Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, 9747 AE Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Simone M. de la Rie

    (ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, 1112 XE Diemen, The Netherlands)

  • Paul A. Boelen

    (ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, 1112 XE Diemen, The Netherlands
    Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Geert E. Smid

    (ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, 1112 XE Diemen, The Netherlands
    Department of Humanist Chaplaincy Studies, University of Humanistic Studies, 3512 HD Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Background: The disappearance of a significant person is an ambiguous loss due to the persistent uncertainty about the whereabouts of the person. Measures specifically capturing the psychological consequences of ambiguous loss are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to develop the Ambiguous Loss Inventory Plus (ALI+) and evaluated its suitability for use with relatives of missing persons. Methods: ALI+ items were generated based on established measures for prolonged grief symptoms and literature on psychological responses to ambiguous loss. Eight relatives of missing persons (three refugees, five non-refugees) and seven international experts on ambiguous loss rated all items in terms of understandability and relevance on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very well). Results: On average, the comprehensibility of the items was rated as high (all items ≥ 3.7). Likewise, all items were rated as relevant for the assessment of common responses to the disappearance of a loved one. Only minor changes were made to the wording of the items based on the experts’ feedback. Conclusions: These descriptive results indicate that the ALI+ seems to cover the intended concept, thus showing promising face and content validity. However, further psychometric evaluations of the ALI+ are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Comtesse & Clare Killikelly & Sophie M. C. Hengst & Lonneke I. M. Lenferink & Simone M. de la Rie & Paul A. Boelen & Geert E. Smid, 2023. "The Ambiguous Loss Inventory Plus (ALI+): Introduction of a Measure of Psychological Reactions to the Disappearance of a Loved One," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5117-:d:1096922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/6/5117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Renner & David Jäckle & Michaela Nagl & Anna Plexnies & Susanne Röhr & Margrit Löbner & Thomas Grochtdreis & Judith Dams & Hans-Helmut König & Steffi Riedel-Heller & Anette Kersting, 2021. "Traumatized Syrian Refugees with Ambiguous Loss: Predictors of Mental Distress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:6:p:5117-:d:1096922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.