IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4672-d1089471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Health-Impact Assessment of an Ergonomic Measure to Reduce the Risk of Work-Related Lower Back Pain, Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome and Knee Osteoarthritis among Floor Layers in The Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • P. Paul F. M. Kuijer

    (Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Henk F. van der Molen

    (Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Steven Visser

    (Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Sand–cement-bound screed floor layers are at risk of work-related lower back pain, lumbosacral radicular syndrome and knee osteoarthritis, given their working technique of levelling screed with their trunk bent while mainly supported by their hands and knees. To reduce the physical demands of bending of the trunk and kneeling, a manually movable screed-levelling machine was developed for floor layers in the Netherlands. The aim of this paper is to estimate the potential health gains of working with a manually movable screed-levelling machine on the risk of lower back pain (LBP), lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LRS) and knee osteoarthritis (KOA) compared to traditional working techniques. This potential health gain was assessed using the epidemiological population estimates of the Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) and the Potential Impact Fraction (PIF), combined with work-related risk estimates for these three disorders from systematic reviews. The percentage of workers exceeding these risk estimates was based on worksite observations among 28 floor layers. For LBP, 16/18 workers were at risk when using traditional working techniques, with a PAF = 38%, and for those using a manually movable screed-levelling machine, this was 6/10 with a PIF = 13%. For LRS, these data were 16/18 with a PAF = 55% and 14/18 with a PIF = 18%, and for KOA, 8/10 with a PAF = 35% and 2/10 with a PIF = 26%. A manually movable screed-levelling machine might have a significant impact on the prevention of LBP, LRS and KOA among floor layers in the Netherlands, and health-impact assessments are a feasible approach for assessing health gains in an efficient way.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Paul F. M. Kuijer & Henk F. van der Molen & Steven Visser, 2023. "A Health-Impact Assessment of an Ergonomic Measure to Reduce the Risk of Work-Related Lower Back Pain, Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome and Knee Osteoarthritis among Floor Layers in The Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4672-:d:1089471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4672/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4672/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4672-:d:1089471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.