IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4599-d1088183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient Experiences and Perspectives of Their Decision-Making to Accept Lung Transplantation Referral: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Mengjie Chen

    (Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Nursing Department, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, No.1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Xueqiong Zou

    (Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Nursing Department, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, No.1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Jiang Nan

    (Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Nursing Department, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, No.1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Baiyila Nuerdawulieti

    (Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Nursing Department, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, No.1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Xiahere Huxitaer

    (Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Nursing Department, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, No.1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Yuyu Jiang

    (Research Office of Chronic Disease Management and Rehabilitation, Nursing Department, Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, No.1800 Lihu Avenue, Wuxi 214122, China)

Abstract

Providing early lung transplantation referral services should be considered to reduce pre-transplant mortality in patients with advanced disease. This study aimed to explore the reasons for lung transplantation referral decisions in patients and provide evidence for the development of transplantation referral services. This was a qualitative, retrospective, and descriptive study involving conventional content analysis. Patients in evaluation, listing, and post-transplant stages were interviewed. A total of 35 participants (25 male and 10 female) were interviewed. Four main themes were defined: (1) expectations for lung transplantation leading to the decision (a gamble for a silver lining, a return to normal life, and occupation); (2) facing uncertain outcomes (personal luck arranging everything; belief in success; incidents leading to “It’s decided then”; hesitation when making a decision due to fear); (3) facing various information from peers, doctors, and so on; (4) complex policy and societal support (providing transplantation referral services earlier, family attachment and oral approval responses contribute to the referral decision, and so on). The findings of this study might enrich existing referral services, including training for family members and healthcare providers, a checklist and package of critical events in the patient lung transplantation referral decision-making process, precision services based on behavioral personas, and a curriculum to enhance patient decision self-efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengjie Chen & Xueqiong Zou & Jiang Nan & Baiyila Nuerdawulieti & Xiahere Huxitaer & Yuyu Jiang, 2023. "Patient Experiences and Perspectives of Their Decision-Making to Accept Lung Transplantation Referral: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4599-:d:1088183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4599/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4599/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria T. Yelle & Patricia E. Stevens & Dorothy M. Lanuza, 2013. "Waiting Narratives of Lung Transplant Candidates," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4599-:d:1088183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.