IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4503-d1086603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the Nasal Cavity Guidance Methods’ Effects during Nasotracheal Intubation Using a Preformed Nasotracheal Tube: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Joungmin Kim

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea
    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun 58128, Republic of Korea)

  • Eun-A Jang

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun 58128, Republic of Korea
    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea)

  • Dongho Kang

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun 58128, Republic of Korea)

  • Seonho Moon

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea)

  • Hong-Beom Bae

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju 61469, Republic of Korea
    Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun 58128, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Nasotracheal intubation is mainly performed to provide a safe airway during maxillofacial surgeries. Several guiding devices are suggested to facilitate nasotracheal intubation and reduce complications. We attempted to compare intubation conditions during nasotracheal intubation using a nasogastric tube and a suction catheter, which are readily available in operating rooms. In this study, 114 patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery were randomly divided into the nasogastric tube guidance group (NG group) and the suction catheter guidance group (SC group). The primary outcome was the total intubation time. Moreover, the incidence and degree of epistaxis, the position of the tube in the nasal cavity after intubation, and the number of manipulations during intubation in the nasal cavity were investigated. The insertion time from the nostril to the oral cavity and the total intubation time were significantly shorter in the SC group than in the NG group ( p < 0.001). The incidence of epistaxis was lower at 35.1% in the NG group and 43.9% in the SC group than the previously reported 60–80%, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups. The use of a suction catheter aid during nasotracheal intubation can be used effectively because it shortens the intubation time and does not increase complications.

Suggested Citation

  • Joungmin Kim & Eun-A Jang & Dongho Kang & Seonho Moon & Hong-Beom Bae, 2023. "Comparison of the Nasal Cavity Guidance Methods’ Effects during Nasotracheal Intubation Using a Preformed Nasotracheal Tube: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4503-:d:1086603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4503/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4503/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4503-:d:1086603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.