IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4440-d1085392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Athletic Trainer’s Varying Levels of Awareness and Use of Disablement Model Frameworks: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rylee T. Haffey

    (Department of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809, USA)

  • Matthew J. Rivera

    (Department of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809, USA)

  • Justin P. Young

    (Department of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809, USA)

  • Zachary K. Winkelmann

    (Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Lindsey E. Eberman

    (Department of Applied Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809, USA)

Abstract

In healthcare, disablement model frameworks aim to improve the delivery of patient-centered care through the recognition of patient factors beyond impairments, restrictions, and limitations, which include personal, environmental, and societal factors. Such benefits translate directly to athletic healthcare providing a mechanism for athletic trainers (ATs), as well as other healthcare professionals, to ensure that all aspects of the patient are managed prior to returning to work or sport. The purpose of this study was to investigate ATs recognition and use of disablement frameworks in current clinical practice. We used criterion sampling to identify ATs who were currently practicing from a random sample of ATs that participated in a related cross-sectional survey. A total of 13 participants engaged in an online, audio-only, semi-structured interview that was audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A consensual qualitative research (CQR) approach was used to analyze the data. A coding team of three individuals used a multi-phase process to construct a consensus codebook that identified common domains and categories among the participants’ responses. Four domains emerged regarding ATs’ experiences and recognition of disablement model frameworks. The first three domains were related to the application of disablement model frameworks: (1) patient-centered care, (2) limitations and impairments, and (3) environment and support. Participants described varying degrees of competence and consciousness regarding these domains. The fourth domain related to participants’ exposure to disablement model frameworks through formal or informal experiences. Findings suggest that ATs largely demonstrate unconscious incompetence regarding the use of disablement frameworks in clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Rylee T. Haffey & Matthew J. Rivera & Justin P. Young & Zachary K. Winkelmann & Lindsey E. Eberman, 2023. "Athletic Trainer’s Varying Levels of Awareness and Use of Disablement Model Frameworks: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4440-:d:1085392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4440/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4440/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4440-:d:1085392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.