IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4343-d1083574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work-Related, Non-Specific Low Back Pain among Physiotherapists in France: Prevalence and Biomechanical and Psychosocial Risk Factors, as a Function of Practice Pattern

Author

Listed:
  • Baptiste Pellissier

    (Institut de Formation en Masso-Kinésithérapie, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 30 Place Pr. Christian Cabrol, CEDEX 1, 80054 Amiens, France
    Institut d’Ingénierie de la Santé-UFR de Médecine, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 3 Rue des Louvels, 80036 Amiens, France)

  • François-Régis Sarhan

    (Institut de Formation en Masso-Kinésithérapie, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 30 Place Pr. Christian Cabrol, CEDEX 1, 80054 Amiens, France
    Institut d’Ingénierie de la Santé-UFR de Médecine, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 3 Rue des Louvels, 80036 Amiens, France
    Equipe Chirurgie et Extrémité Céphalique Caractérisation Morphologique et Fonctionnelle UR 7516, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, CHU-Amiens, Place Pr. Christian Cabrol, CEDEX 1, 80054 Amiens, France)

  • Frédéric Telliez

    (Institut d’Ingénierie de la Santé-UFR de Médecine, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 3 Rue des Louvels, 80036 Amiens, France
    Laboratoire PériTox UMR_I 01, Centre Universitaire de Recherche en Santé, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Chemin du Thil, 80025 Amiens, France)

Abstract

Background. Physiotherapists worldwide experience lower back pain (LBP). Up to 80% of physiotherapists report having experienced an episode of LBP at some point in their career, and LBP is the most common musculoskeletal disorder in this profession. In France, the prevalence of LBP among physiotherapists and associated work-related risk factors have not previously been studied. Objective. To determine whether the risk of work-related non-specific LBP among French physiotherapists depends on practice pattern. Method. A link to an online self-questionnaire was sent to French physiotherapists. The various practice patterns were compared with regard to the prevalence of LBP, the total number of days with LBP during the previous 12 months, and the degree of exposure to biomechanical, psychosocial and organisational risk factors. Results. Among the 604 physiotherapists included in the study, the prevalence of work-related, non-specific LBP in the previous 12 months was 40.4%. The prevalence was significantly greater among physiotherapists working in geriatrics ( p = 0.033) and significantly lower in sports medicine ( p = 0.010). Differences in exposure to risk factors were also found. Conclusions. The risk of non-specific LBP among French physiotherapists appears to depend on the mode of practice. All the various dimensions of risk must be taken into account. The present study could serve as a basis for more targeted research on the most exposed practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Baptiste Pellissier & François-Régis Sarhan & Frédéric Telliez, 2023. "Work-Related, Non-Specific Low Back Pain among Physiotherapists in France: Prevalence and Biomechanical and Psychosocial Risk Factors, as a Function of Practice Pattern," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4343-:d:1083574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4343/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4343/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4343-:d:1083574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.