IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p3902-d1076712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Pilot Study of Training Peer Recovery Specialists in Behavioral Activation in the United States: Preliminary Outcomes and Predictors of Competence

Author

Listed:
  • Morgan S. Anvari

    (Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Mary B. Kleinman

    (Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Dwayne Dean

    (Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Alexandra L. Rose

    (Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Valerie D. Bradley

    (Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Abigail C. Hines

    (Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Tolulope M. Abidogun

    (Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

  • Julia W. Felton

    (Center for Health Policy & Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA)

  • Jessica F. Magidson

    (Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA)

Abstract

Background: The peer recovery specialist (PRS) workforce has rapidly expanded to increase access to substance-use disorder services for underserved communities. PRSs are not typically trained in evidence-based interventions (EBIs) outside of motivational interviewing, although evidence demonstrates the feasibility of PRS delivery of certain EBIs, such as a brief behavioral intervention, behavioral activation. However, characteristics that predict PRS competency in delivering EBIs such as behavioral activation remain unknown, and are critical for PRS selection, training, and supervision if the PRS role is expanded. This study aimed to explore the outcomes of a brief PRS training period in behavioral activation and identify predictors of competence. Method: Twenty PRSs in the United States completed a two-hour training on PRS-delivered behavioral activation. Participants completed baseline and post-training assessments, including roleplay and assessments of PRS characteristics, attitudes towards EBIs, and theoretically relevant personality constructs. Roleplays were coded for competence (behavioral activation specific and PRS skills more broadly, i.e., PRS competence) and changes were assessed from baseline to post-training. Linear regression models tested factors predicting post-training competence, controlling for baseline competence. Results: There was a significant pre-post increase in behavioral activation competence ( t = −7.02, p < 0.001). Years working as a PRS significantly predicted post-training behavioral activation skills ( B = 0.16, p = 0.005). No variables predicted post-training PRS competence. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that behavioral activation may be appropriate for dissemination to PRSs through brief trainings, particularly for PRSs with more work experience. However, additional research is needed to examine predictors of competence among PRSs.

Suggested Citation

  • Morgan S. Anvari & Mary B. Kleinman & Dwayne Dean & Alexandra L. Rose & Valerie D. Bradley & Abigail C. Hines & Tolulope M. Abidogun & Julia W. Felton & Jessica F. Magidson, 2023. "A Pilot Study of Training Peer Recovery Specialists in Behavioral Activation in the United States: Preliminary Outcomes and Predictors of Competence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3902-:d:1076712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3902/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3902/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3902-:d:1076712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.