IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p3819-d1075710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Jooyeon Ko

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu Health College, Daegu 41453, Republic of Korea
    Korean Balance Ability Data Center, Daegu 41453, Republic of Korea
    Both authors contributed equally to this study and both are corresponding authors.)

  • Hyun Kyoon Lim

    (Medical Measurement Team, Korea Research Institutes of Standards and Science, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
    Department of Medical Physics, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
    Both authors contributed equally to this study and both are corresponding authors.)

Abstract

The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) was developed to evaluate the motor development of infants up to 18 months of age. We studied 252 infants in three groups (105 healthy preterm infants (HPI), 50 preterm infants with brain injury (PIBI), and 97 healthy full-term infants (HFI) under 18 months, corrected age (CoA)) using AIMS. No significant differences were found among HPI, PIBI, and HFI in infants less than 3 months old, yet significant differences were noted in positional scores ( p < 0.05) and total scores for those four to six months of age and seven to nine months of age. A significant difference was also found in standing items for infants over 10 months ( p < 0.05). After four months, there was a difference in motor development between preterm (with and without brain injury) and full-term infants. In particular, there was a significant difference in motor development between HPI and HFI and between PIBI and HFI at four to nine months, when motor skills developed explosively ( p < 0.05). After four months, motor developmental delays (10th ≥) were observed in HPI and PIBI at rates of 26% and 45.8%, respectively. Midline supine development, a representative indicator of early motor development, was slower even in healthy preterm infants than in full-term infants. AIMS has a good resolution to discriminate preterm infants who are showing insufficient motor development from 4 months to 9 months.

Suggested Citation

  • Jooyeon Ko & Hyun Kyoon Lim, 2023. "Motor Development Comparison between Preterm and Full-Term Infants Using Alberta Infant Motor Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-10, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3819-:d:1075710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3819/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/3819/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jooyeon Ko & Hyun Kyoon Lim, 2022. "Reliability Study of the Items of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) Using Kappa Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-10, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:3819-:d:1075710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.