IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3664-d1073226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physiological and Mechanical Responses to a Graded Exercise Test in Traditional Rowing

Author

Listed:
  • Alfonso Penichet-Tomas

    (Research Group in Health, Physical Activity, and Sports Technology (Health-Tech), Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain)

  • Jose M. Jimenez-Olmedo

    (Research Group in Health, Physical Activity, and Sports Technology (Health-Tech), Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain)

  • Basilio Pueo

    (Research Group in Health, Physical Activity, and Sports Technology (Health-Tech), Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain)

  • Javier Olaya-Cuartero

    (Research Group in Health, Physical Activity, and Sports Technology (Health-Tech), Faculty of Education, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain)

Abstract

Maximum oxygen consumption and maximum power output are critical measures for training prescription in endurance sports such as rowing. The objective of this investigation was twofold: to compare the physiological and mechanical responses of female and male traditional rowers during a graded exercise test and to establish reference values in this specific rowing modality that have not yet been documented, unlike in Olympic rowing. Twenty-one highly trained/national level rowers participated in the study: 11 female (age: 30.1 ± 10.6 years, height: 167.3 ± 5.0 cm, body mass: 61.9 ± 4.9 kg) and 10 males (age: 33.5 ± 6.6 years, height: 180.8 ± 6.9 cm, body mass: 74.4 ± 6.9 kg). Significant differences ( p < 0.05) were found in rowing performance between sexes, with a very large effect size ( d = 7.2). The peak power output for the female rowers was 180.9 ± 11.4 W and 287.0 ± 17.7 W for the male rowers. The female rowers reached a VO 2max of 51.2 ± 6.6 mL/kg/min at a mean of 174.5 ± 12.9 W, while the males’ VO 2max was 62.1 ± 4.7 mL/kg/min at a mean of 280.0 ± 20.5 W. These differences in VO 2max and maximal aerobic capacity were significant ( p < 0.05), with a large ( d = 1.9) and very large ( d = 6.2) effect size, respectively. A moderate association between VO 2max, and rowing performance expressed in watts per kilogram of muscle mass was observed in the female rowers ( r = 0.40, p = 0.228). For the male rowers, the correlation between VO 2max and relative peak power output in watts per kilogram of body mass was strong ( r = 0.68; p = 0.031). This study highlights the differences in the kinetics of ventilatory and mechanical parameters between female and male rowers and the importance of these differences for specific physical preparation in traditional rowing.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfonso Penichet-Tomas & Jose M. Jimenez-Olmedo & Basilio Pueo & Javier Olaya-Cuartero, 2023. "Physiological and Mechanical Responses to a Graded Exercise Test in Traditional Rowing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3664-:d:1073226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3664/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3664/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Álvaro Huerta Ojeda & Miguel Riquelme Guerra & Walter Coronado Román & María-Mercedes Yeomans & Rodrigo Fuentes-Kloss, 2022. "Kinetics of ventilatory and mechanical parameters of novice male rowers on the rowing ergometer," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 422-436, May.
    2. Zacharias Papadakis & Michelle Etchebaster & Sergi Garcia-Retortillo, 2022. "Cardiorespiratory Coordination in Collegiate Rowing: A Network Approach to Cardiorespiratory Exercise Testing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Alfonso Penichet-Tomas & Basilio Pueo & Sergio Selles-Perez & Jose M. Jimenez-Olmedo, 2021. "Analysis of Anthropometric and Body Composition Profile in Male and Female Traditional Rowers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-11, July.
    4. Emanuela Faelli & Marco Panascì & Vittoria Ferrando & Roberto Codella & Ambra Bisio & Piero Ruggeri, 2022. "High-Intensity Interval Training for Rowing: Acute Responses in National-Level Adolescent Males," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-11, July.
    5. Robert Podstawski & Krzysztof Borysławski & Zsolt Bálint Katona & Zoltan Alföldi & Michał Boraczyński & Jarosław Jaszczur-Nowicki & Piotr Gronek, 2022. "Sex Differences in Anthropometric and Physiological Profiles of Hungarian Rowers of Different Ages," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Podstawski & Krzysztof Borysławski & Zsolt Bálint Katona & Zoltan Alföldi & Michał Boraczyński & Jarosław Jaszczur-Nowicki & Piotr Gronek, 2022. "Sex Differences in Anthropometric and Physiological Profiles of Hungarian Rowers of Different Ages," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Michel Oliveira Silva & Tony Meireles Santos & Allan Inoue & Lucas Eduardo Rodrigues Santos & Weydyson de Lima do Nascimento Anastácio & Eduardo Lattari & Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho Oliveira, 2023. "Is There a Dose–Response Relationship between High-Intensity Interval Exercise (HIIE) Intensity and Affective Valence? Analysis of Three HIIE Sessions Performed with Different Amplitudes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Francesco Campa & Gianpiero Greco, 2022. "Growth, Somatic Maturation, and Their Impact on Physical Health and Sports Performance: An Editorial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-4, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3664-:d:1073226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.