IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3542-d1071499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of a Person-Centered Prescription Model in Hospitalized Older People at the End of Life According to Their Disease Trajectories and Frailty Index

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Ferro-Uriguen

    (Department of Pharmacy, Ricardo Bermingham Hospital—Matia Foundation, 20018 Donostia, Spain)

  • Idoia Beobide-Telleria

    (Department of Pharmacy, Ricardo Bermingham Hospital—Matia Foundation, 20018 Donostia, Spain)

  • Javier Gil-Goikouria

    (Department of Physiology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Bilbao, Spain
    Network Centre for Biomedical Research in Mental Health to the Institute of Health Carlos III (CIBERSAM ISCIII), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Petra Teresa Peña-Labour

    (Department of Geriatrics, Ricardo Bermingham Hospital—Matia Foundation, 20018 Donostia, Spain)

  • Andrea Díaz-Vila

    (Department of Geriatrics, Ricardo Bermingham Hospital—Matia Foundation, 20018 Donostia, Spain)

  • Arlovia Teresa Herasme-Grullón

    (Department of Geriatrics, Ricardo Bermingham Hospital—Matia Foundation, 20018 Donostia, Spain)

  • Enrique Echevarría-Orella

    (Department of Physiology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Bilbao, Spain
    Network Centre for Biomedical Research in Mental Health to the Institute of Health Carlos III (CIBERSAM ISCIII), 28029 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This study aimed to comparatively analyze the effect of the person-centered prescription (PCP) model on pharmacotherapeutic indicators and the costs of pharmacological treatment between a dementia-like trajectory and an end-stage organ failure trajectory, and two states of frailty (cut-off point 0.5). A randomized controlled trial was conducted with patients aged ≥65 years admitted to a subacute hospital and identified by the Necessity of Palliative Care test to require palliative care. Data were collected from February 2018 to February 2020. Variables assessed included sociodemographic, clinical, degree-of-frailty, and several pharmacotherapeutic indicators and the 28-day medication cost. Fifty-five patients with dementia-like trajectory and 26 with organ failure trajectory were recruited observing significant differences at hospital admission in the mean number of medications (7.6 vs. 9.7; p < 0.004), the proportion of people on more than 10 medications (20.0% vs. 53.8%; p < 0.002), the number of drug–drug interactions (2.7 vs. 5.1; p < 0.006), and the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) (25.7 vs. 33.4; p < 0.006), respectively. Also, regarding dementia-like patients, after application of the PCP model, these patients improved significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group in the mean number of chronic medications, STOPP Frail Criteria, MRCI and the 28-day cost of regular medications ( p < 0.05) between admission and discharge. As for the PCP effect on the control and the intervention group at the end-stage organ failure, we did not observe statistically significant differences. On the other hand, when the effect of the PCP model on different degrees of frailty was evaluated, no unequal behavior was observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Ferro-Uriguen & Idoia Beobide-Telleria & Javier Gil-Goikouria & Petra Teresa Peña-Labour & Andrea Díaz-Vila & Arlovia Teresa Herasme-Grullón & Enrique Echevarría-Orella, 2023. "Effectiveness of a Person-Centered Prescription Model in Hospitalized Older People at the End of Life According to Their Disease Trajectories and Frailty Index," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3542-:d:1071499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3542/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3542/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3542-:d:1071499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.