IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3451-d1070034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Routine Ophthalmological Examination Rates in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease Are Low and Must Be Improved

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Zulueta

    (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Caterina P. Minniti

    (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Anvit Rai

    (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA)

  • Tiana J. Toribio

    (Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA)

  • Jee-Young Moon

    (Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA)

  • Umar K. Mian

    (Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA
    Department of Pediatrics, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA)

Abstract

The American Academy of Ophthalmology and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute recommend patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) undergo dilated funduscopic exams (DFE) every 1–2 years to screen for sickle retinopathy. There is a paucity of data on the adherence rate to these guidelines; a retrospective study was performed to evaluate our institution’s adherence. A chart review of 842 adults with SCD, seen 3/2017–3/2021 in the Montefiore healthcare system ( All Patients ), was done. Only about half of All Patients (n = 842) had >1 DFE during the study period ( Total Examined Patients , n = 415). The Total Examined Patients were categorized as screening, those without retinopathy ( Retinopathy− , n = 199), or follow-up, including individuals previously diagnosed with retinopathy ( Retinopathy+ , n = 216). Only 40.3% of screening patients (n = 87) had DFE at least biennially. As expected, there was a significant decrease in the average DFE rate of the Total Examined Patients after the COVID-19 pandemic started (13.6%) compared to pre-COVID (29.8%, p < 0.001). Similarly, there was a significant decrease in the screening rate of Retinopathy− patients from 18.6% on average pre-COVID to 6.7% during COVID ( p < 0.001). This data shows the sickle retinopathy screening rate is low and innovative approaches may need to be employed to remedy this issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Zulueta & Caterina P. Minniti & Anvit Rai & Tiana J. Toribio & Jee-Young Moon & Umar K. Mian, 2023. "Routine Ophthalmological Examination Rates in Adults with Sickle Cell Disease Are Low and Must Be Improved," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-8, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3451-:d:1070034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3451/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3451/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3451-:d:1070034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.