IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3026-d1062722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pediatric Ventilation Skills by Non-Healthcare Students: Effectiveness, Self-Perception, and Preference

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Martínez-Isasi

    (CLINURSID Research Group, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
    SICRUS Research Group, Institute of Health Research of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Cristina Jorge-Soto

    (CLINURSID Research Group, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
    SICRUS Research Group, Institute of Health Research of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Cecilia Castro-Fernández

    (Nursing Faculty of Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • Clara Baltar-Lorenzo

    (Nursing Faculty of Santiago de Compostela, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain)

  • María Sobrido-Prieto

    (Health Sciences Department, University of A Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain)

  • Jose Manteiga-Urbón

    (Pediatric Emergencies Unit, Biomedic Research Institute of A Coruña—INIBIC, University Hospital of A Coruña (CHUAC), SERGAS, 15006 A Coruña, Spain)

  • Roberto Barcala-Furelos

    (CLINURSID Research Group, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
    REMOSS Research Group, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain)

Abstract

Since a great number of infant cardiopulmonary arrests occur outside of the hospital, it is crucial to train laypersons in cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques, especially those professionals that will work with infants and children. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the efectiveness of ventilations performed by professional training students. The secondary objective was to analyze the preference between different ventilation and chest-compression methods. The sample consisted of 32 professional training students, 15 preschool students, and 17 physical education students. The activity was conducted separately for each group, and we provided a 10 min theoretical training about infant basic life support followed by a 45 min practical training using a Laerdal Little Anne QCPR CPR manikin. A practical test in pairs was organized to record the ventilation as performed by the participants, establishing the difference between the efficacious and the non-efficacious ones. Furthermore, we handed out a survey before and after training to evaluate their knowledge. More than 90% of the students completely agreed with the importance of learning cardiopulmonary resuscitation techniques for their professional future. More than half of the sample considered that they perform the rescue breathings with the mouth-to-mouth method better. We observed that through mouth-to-mouth-nose ventilations, the number of effective ventilations was significantly higher than the effective ventilations provided by a self-inflating bag and mask (EffectiveMtoMN 6.42 ± 4.27 vs. EffectiveMask 4.75 ± 3.63 ( p = 0.007)), which was the preferred method. In terms of the compression method, hands encircling the chest was preferred by more than 85% of students. Mouth-to-mouth nose ventilation is more efficient than bag-face-mask ventilation in CPR as performed by professional training and physical activity students. This fact must be considered to provide higher-quality training sessions to professional training students.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Martínez-Isasi & Cristina Jorge-Soto & Cecilia Castro-Fernández & Clara Baltar-Lorenzo & María Sobrido-Prieto & Jose Manteiga-Urbón & Roberto Barcala-Furelos, 2023. "Pediatric Ventilation Skills by Non-Healthcare Students: Effectiveness, Self-Perception, and Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3026-:d:1062722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3026/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3026/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3026-:d:1062722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.