IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p2979-d1061793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid Start-Up Characteristics of Anammox under Different Inoculation Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Qiong Tan

    (Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China
    National Center of Technology Innovation for Pigs, Chongqing 402460, China)

  • Suhui Xia

    (State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Wenlai Xu

    (Key Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China)

  • Yue Jian

    (Chongqing Academy of Animal Sciences, Chongqing 402460, China
    National Center of Technology Innovation for Pigs, Chongqing 402460, China)

Abstract

The long multiplication time and extremely demanding enrichment environment requirements of Anammox bacteria (AAOB) have led to difficult reactor start-ups and hindered its practical dissemination. Few feasibility studies have been reported on the recovery of AAOB activity initiation after inlet substrate disconnection caused by an unfavorable condition, and few factors, such as indicators of the recovery process, have been explored. Therefore, in this experiment, two modified expanded granular sludge bed reactors (EGSB) were inoculated with 1.5 L anaerobic granular sludge (AGS) + 1 L Anammox sludge (AMS) (R1) and 2.5 L anaerobic granular sludge (AGS) (R2), respectively. After a long-term (140 days) starvation shock at a high temperature (38 °C), the bacteria population activity recovery experiments were conducted. After 160 days, both reactors were successfully started up, and the total nitrogen removal rates exceeded 87%. Due to the experimental period, the total nitrogen removal rate of R2 was slightly higher than that of R1 in the final stage. However, it is undeniable that R2 had a relatively long activity delay during startup, while R1 had no significant activity delay during startup. The sludge obtained from R1 had a higher specific anammox activity (SAA). Analysis of the extracellular polymer substances (EPS) results showed that the extracellular polymer content in R1 was higher than that in R2 throughout the recovery process, indicating that R1 had higher sludge stability and denitrification performance. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis showed that more extracellular filamentous bacteria could be seen in the R1 reactor with better morphology of Anammox bacteria. In contrast, the R2 reactor had fewer extracellular hyphae and micropores as a percentage and higher filamentous bacteria content. The results of microbial 16SrDNA analysis showed that R1 used AAOB as inoculum to initiate Anammox, and the reactor was enriched with Anammox bacteria earlier and in much greater abundance than R2. The experimental results indicated that inoculating mixed anaerobic granular sludge and Anammox sludge to initiate an anammox reactor was more effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiong Tan & Suhui Xia & Wenlai Xu & Yue Jian, 2023. "Rapid Start-Up Characteristics of Anammox under Different Inoculation Conditions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2979-:d:1061793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2979/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2979/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2979-:d:1061793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.