IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p2876-d1059936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Threat through the Screen? Association between Proximity and/or Watching Media Coverage of a Terrorist Attack and Health

Author

Listed:
  • Roel Van Overmeire

    (Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
    Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS), 0484 Oslo, Norway)

  • Lise Eilin Stene

    (Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS), 0484 Oslo, Norway)

  • Marie Vandekerckhove

    (Faculty of Psychology & Educational Science, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium
    Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, University of Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Stefaan Six

    (Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Reginald Deschepper

    (Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Johan Bilsen

    (Mental Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

Introduction: After terrorist attacks, media coverage of the attacks is extensive. There are some indications that there is an association between watching the media coverage and certain health reactions, both mental and somatic. Most studies occur in the United States and often months after the initial attack. In the current study, we investigated the terrorist attacks in Belgium on 22 March 2016. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted one week after the attacks among the general population of Belgium. We measured hours of media watching of the terrorist attacks (hereafter media watching), adjusted scales of the Patient Health Questionaire-4 (PHQ-4) to measure mental symptoms and the Patient Health Questionaire-15 (PHQ-15) to measure somatic symptoms, proximity to Brussels (home, work and overall proximity) and background factors such as gender, age and level of education. Respondents were included if they answered the survey between 29 March 2016 and 5 April 2016. Results: A total of 2972 respondents were included. Overall, media watching was significantly associated with both mental symptoms ( p < 0.001) and somatic symptoms ( p < 0.001), while controlling for age, gender, level of education and proximity. Watching more than three hours of media was associated with more mental and somatic symptoms ( p < 0.001). Compared to proximity, media watching was, in general, a better association. For geographical factors, watching more than three hours of media indicated equally high scores for mental symptoms and somatic symptoms as work proximity ( p = 0.015) and overall proximity to the attacks ( p = 0.024). Conclusion: Media-watching is associated with acute health reactions after terrorist attacks. However, the direction of the relationship is unclear, as it might also be that people with health issues seek out more media.

Suggested Citation

  • Roel Van Overmeire & Lise Eilin Stene & Marie Vandekerckhove & Stefaan Six & Reginald Deschepper & Johan Bilsen, 2023. "Threat through the Screen? Association between Proximity and/or Watching Media Coverage of a Terrorist Attack and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2876-:d:1059936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2876/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2876/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2876-:d:1059936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.