IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p2796-d1058117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Access to Maternity Protection and Potential Implications for Breastfeeding Practices of Domestic Workers in the Western Cape of South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Pereira-Kotze

    (School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa)

  • Mieke Faber

    (Non-Communicable Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa
    Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa)

  • Luke Kannemeyer

    (SweepSouth, Cape Town 8000, South Africa)

  • Tanya Doherty

    (School of Public Health, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa
    Health Systems Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa)

Abstract

Access to comprehensive maternity protection could contribute to improved breastfeeding practices for working women. Domestic workers are a vulnerable group. This study aimed to explore perceptions of and accessibility to maternity protection among domestic workers in the Western Cape, South Africa, and potential implications of maternity protection access for breastfeeding practices. This was a mixed-method cross-sectional study including a quantitative online survey with 4635 South African domestic workers and 13 individual in-depth interviews with domestic workers. Results from the online survey showed that domestic workers had inconsistent knowledge of maternity-protection entitlements. Data from individual in-depth interviews showed that most participants struggled to access all components of comprehensive maternity protection, with some entitlements being inconsistently and informally available. Most domestic workers were unfamiliar with the concept of breaks to breastfeed or express milk. Participants provided suggestions for improving domestic workers’ access to maternity protection. We conclude that improved access to all components of maternity protection would result in improved quality of care for women during pregnancy, around the time of childbirth and on return to work, and for their newborns, especially if an enabling environment for breastfeeding were created. Universal comprehensive maternity protection could contribute to improved care for all working women and their children.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Pereira-Kotze & Mieke Faber & Luke Kannemeyer & Tanya Doherty, 2023. "Access to Maternity Protection and Potential Implications for Breastfeeding Practices of Domestic Workers in the Western Cape of South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2796-:d:1058117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tuan T. Nguyen & Jennifer Cashin & Ha T. T. Tran & Duong H. Vu & Arijit Nandi & Minh T. Phan & Nguyen D. C. Van & Amy Weissman & Toan N. Pham & Binh V. Nguyen & Roger Mathisen, 2022. "Awareness, Perceptions, Gaps, and Uptake of Maternity Protection among Formally Employed Women in Vietnam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. De Stefano, Valerio. & Durri, Ilda. & Stylogiannis, Charalampos. & Wouters, Mathias., 2021. "Platform work and the employment relationship," ILO Working Papers 995121493302676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria G. Girich & Kristina V. Ivanovicheva & Antonina D. Levashenko, 2022. "Taxation and Social Insurance for Employees of Online Platforms: Comparison of Russian and International Experience," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 3, pages 44-60, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2796-:d:1058117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.