IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2666-d1054882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postoperative Pain after Different Transscleral Laser Cyclophotocoagulation Procedures

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Falb

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria)

  • Astrid Heidinger

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria)

  • Fabian Wallisch

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria)

  • Hrvoje Tomasic

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria)

  • Domagoj Ivastinovic

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria)

  • Marlene Lindner

    (Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria)

  • Franz Tiefenthaller

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria)

  • Lukas Keintzel

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria)

  • Lukas Hoeflechner

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria)

  • Regina Riedl

    (Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria)

  • Anton Hommer

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Sanatorium Hera, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Ewald Lindner

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria)

Abstract

Background: As the number of surgical options in glaucoma treatment is continuously rising, evidence regarding distinctive features of these surgeries is becoming more and more important for clinicians to choose the right surgical treatment for each individual patient. Methods: For this retrospective data analysis, we included glaucoma patients treated with either continuous wave (CW-TSCPC) or micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) in an inpatient setting. Pain intensity was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) during hospitalization. CW-TSCPC was performed using OcuLight ® Six (IRIDEX Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA) and MP-TSCPC was performed using the IRIDEX ® Cyclo-G6 System (IRIDEX Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA). Results: A total of 243 consecutive cases of TSCPC were included. Of these, 144 (59.26%) were treated with CW-TSCPC and 99 (40.74%) with MP-TSCPC. Using the univariable model, the risk for postoperative pain was observed to be lower in MP-TSCPC compared with CW-TSCPC (unadjusted: OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24–0.84, p = 0.017), but this did not hold using the multivariable model (adjusted: OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27–1.02, p = 0.056). Simultaneously conducted anterior retinal cryotherapy was associated with a higher risk for postoperative pain (OR 4.41, 95% CI 2.01–9.69, p < 0.001). Conclusions: We found that the occurrence of postoperative pain was not different in CW-TSCPC compared with MP-TSCPC in a multivariable model. In cases of simultaneous anterior retinal cryotherapy, the risk for postoperative pain was significantly higher.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Falb & Astrid Heidinger & Fabian Wallisch & Hrvoje Tomasic & Domagoj Ivastinovic & Marlene Lindner & Franz Tiefenthaller & Lukas Keintzel & Lukas Hoeflechner & Regina Riedl & Anton Hommer & Ewa, 2023. "Postoperative Pain after Different Transscleral Laser Cyclophotocoagulation Procedures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-8, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2666-:d:1054882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2666/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2666/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2666-:d:1054882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.