IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2664-d1054784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Maturity Evaluation Model of Enterprise Safety Culture

Author

Listed:
  • Jingjing Pei

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Lu Liu

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ying Chi

    (Beijing Institute of Electronic System Engineering, Beijing 100854, China)

  • Chengyang Yu

    (Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China Flight Test Center, Shanghai 201323, China)

Abstract

To regulate the safety behavior of employees and improve the occupational safety level of enterprises. Based on the perspective of safety culture, this paper designed an index system based on the four dimensions of safety concept, system, behavior, and physical culture, and it explored a new quantitative assessment method of safety culture level by introducing the concept of maturity into the evaluation of safety culture using the grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Combining the characteristics of enterprise safety culture, safety culture was divided into five levels, including original level, starting level, development level, completion level, and leading level, and the maturity model of enterprise safety culture was established. Finally, taking an enterprise to be evaluated as an example, the evaluation steps and application of evaluation results were introduced. The results showed that the evaluation model of enterprise safety culture maturity constructed in this paper provides systematic measurement indexes and scientific evaluation methods for evaluating the safety culture maturity of enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingjing Pei & Lu Liu & Ying Chi & Chengyang Yu, 2023. "Research on the Maturity Evaluation Model of Enterprise Safety Culture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2664-:d:1054784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2664/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2664/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2664-:d:1054784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.