IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2401-d1050625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implant Survival in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Iris Alla

    (Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

  • Felice Lorusso

    (Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

  • Sergio Alexandre Gehrke

    (Department of Research, Bioface/PgO/UCAM, Montevideo 11100, Uruguay
    Department of Biotechnology, Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Murcia, Spain)

  • Francesco Inchingolo

    (Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Section of Dentistry, University of Bari School of Medicine, Piazza G. Cesare, 11, 70124 Bari, Italy)

  • Maristella Di Carmine

    (Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

  • Antonio Scarano

    (Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this systematic review and case reports was to evaluate osseointegration and implant survival rate in patients with chronic kidney disease. Methods: The paper screening process was conducted on electronic databases in order to identify clinical studies concerning the study topic. The literature data were evaluated for eligibility and studies were included for the qualitative synthesis. The case report concerned a male subject affected by renal disorders, a candidate for full arch immediate loading procedure. Results: The article screening process reported a total of 54 manuscripts and one paper identified through the manual search. At the end of the review process, a total of 45 articles were excluded while nine manuscripts were included for the descriptive synthesis. No significant complications or events were present during the intraoperative/post-operative phases. The clinical course reported no significant inflammation or symptoms. At follow-up, the rehabilitation was found to be functionally and aesthetically integrated with no complications, probing, or bone resorption. Conclusions: The available evidence supports the clinical efficacy of the early implant placement protocol. Present findings indicate that the early implant placement protocol results in implant outcomes similar to immediate and delayed placement protocols and a superior stability of peri-implant hard tissue compared with immediate implant placement.

Suggested Citation

  • Iris Alla & Felice Lorusso & Sergio Alexandre Gehrke & Francesco Inchingolo & Maristella Di Carmine & Antonio Scarano, 2023. "Implant Survival in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2401-:d:1050625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2401/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2401/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2401-:d:1050625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.