Measured Air Flow Leakage in Facemask Usage

The importance of wearing a facemask during a pandemic has been widely discussed, and a number of studies have been undertaken to provide evidence of a reduced infectious virus dose because of wearing facemasks. Here, one aspect that has received little attention is the fraction of breathing flow that is not filtered because it passes as leak flow between the mask and face. Its reduction would be beneficial in reducing the dose response. The results of the present study include the filter material pressure loss parameters, pressure distributions under masks, and the fraction of breathing flow leaked versus steady breathing flow in the range of 5 to 30 L min −1 , for two commonly used facemasks mounted on mannequins, in the usual ‘casual’ way and in a ‘tight’ way by means of three different fitters placed over the mask to improve the seals. For the ‘casual’ mount, leaks were high: 83% to 99% for both masks at both exhalation and inhalation flows. For the ‘tight’ mount with different fitters, the masks showed different lower levels in the range of 18 to 66% of leakage, which, for exhalation, were nearly independent of flow rate, while for inhalation, were decreasing with increasing rates of respiration flows, probably because suction improved the sealing. In practice, masks are worn in a ‘casual’ mount, which would imply that nearly all contagious viruses found in aerosols small enough to follow air streams would be exhaled to and inhaled from the ambient air.