IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2234-d1047737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Compassionate City” in Patients with Advanced Illnesses and at the End of Life: A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Librada-Flores

    (New Health Foundation, 41004 Sevilla, Spain)

  • María Jesús Pérez-Solano Vázquez

    (New Health Foundation, 41004 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Miguel Ángel Lucas-Díaz

    (New Health Foundation, 41004 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Zacarías Rodríguez Álvarez-Ossorio

    (New Health Foundation, 41004 Sevilla, Spain)

  • Emilio Herrera-Molina

    (New Health Foundation, 41004 Sevilla, Spain)

  • María Nabal-Vicuña

    (Palliative Care Team, Arnau de Villanova Hospital, 25198 Lleida, Spain)

  • María Dolores Guerra-Martín

    (Department of Nursing, University of Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain)

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate, in a Compassionate City pilot experience (Sevilla), the impact results on health in a population of people with advanced illness and at the end of life. Methods: The project was undertaken in Sevilla, Spain, between January 2019 and June 2020. A longitudinal, descriptive study was conducted using a longitudinal cohort design with two cross-sectional measurements, pre and post intervention. All patients who entered the program on the start date were included. The networks of care around people with advanced illness and at the end of life, palliative care needs, quality of life, loneliness, anxiety, depression, caregivers’ burden and family satisfaction were evaluated. The interventions were conducted by community promoters assigned to the “Sevilla Contigo, Compassionate City” program. Results: A total of 83 people were included in the program. The average number of people involved in care at the beginning of the evaluations was 3.6, increasing to 6.1 at the end of the interventions. The average number of needs detected at the beginning was 15.58, and at the end of interventions, it was 16.56 out of 25. The unmet needs were those related to last wishes (40.7%), emotional relief (18.5%), entertainment (16%), help to walk up and down stairs (8.6%) and help to walk (6.2%). A total of 54.2% showed improved loneliness in the final evaluation. Out of 26 people evaluated for pre and post quality of life, 7 (26.9%) improved their quality of life in the general evaluation and 5 (19.2%) displayed improved anxiety/depression. A total of 6 people (28.6%) improved their quality-of-life thermometer scores. A total of 57.7% of caregivers improved their burden with a mean score of 17.8.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Librada-Flores & María Jesús Pérez-Solano Vázquez & Miguel Ángel Lucas-Díaz & Zacarías Rodríguez Álvarez-Ossorio & Emilio Herrera-Molina & María Nabal-Vicuña & María Dolores Guerra-Martín, 2023. "“Compassionate City” in Patients with Advanced Illnesses and at the End of Life: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2234-:d:1047737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2234/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2234/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvia Librada-Flores & María Nabal-Vicuña & Diana Forero-Vega & Ingrid Muñoz-Mayorga & María Dolores Guerra-Martín, 2020. "Implementation Models of Compassionate Communities and Compassionate Cities at the End of Life: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2234-:d:1047737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.