IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2118-d1045544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informed Consent: Legal Obligation or Cornerstone of the Care Relationship?

Author

Listed:
  • Margherita Pallocci

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Michele Treglia

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Pierluigi Passalacqua

    (Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Roberta Tittarelli

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Claudia Zanovello

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Lucilla De Luca

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Valentina Caparrelli

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Vincenzo De Luna

    (Department of Clinical Science and Translational Medicine, Section of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Alberto Michele Cisterna

    (XIII Section, Civil Court of Rome, 00192 Rome, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Quintavalle

    (Fondazione Policlinico “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Luigi Tonino Marsella

    (Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

The topic of informed consent has become increasingly important in recent decades, both in the ethical-deontological field and as a duty of law. The review covered all sentences issued by the 13th section of the Civil Court of Rome during the period January 2016–December 2020. During this period, 156 judgments were found in which a breach of consent was required; in 24 of these, specific liability was proven, and the corresponding compensation liquidated. Moreover, 80% of the cases concerned the lack of information provided. The most involved branches were those related to surgical areas: general surgery, plastic surgery and aesthetic medicine and orthopaedics. The total amount of compensation paid was EUR 287,144.59. The research carried out has highlighted how, in a broad jurisprudential context, the damage caused by the violation of the right related to informed consent is considered, and how it impacts on the economic compensation of damages. Additionally, it showed that the areas most affected by the information deficit are those related to the performance of surgical activities, which are characterized by greater invasiveness and a higher risk of adverse events. The data reported underline the exigency to consider informed consent not as a mere documentary allegation but as an essential moment in the construction of a valid therapeutic alliance, which is also useful for avoiding unnecessary litigation that is becoming increasingly burdensome for healthcare systems all over the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Margherita Pallocci & Michele Treglia & Pierluigi Passalacqua & Roberta Tittarelli & Claudia Zanovello & Lucilla De Luca & Valentina Caparrelli & Vincenzo De Luna & Alberto Michele Cisterna & Giuseppe, 2023. "Informed Consent: Legal Obligation or Cornerstone of the Care Relationship?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2118-:d:1045544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2118-:d:1045544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.