IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p1926-d1042185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Swallowing Functions after Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Loose Fixation for Mandibular Prognathism: A Retrospective Case Series Research

Author

Listed:
  • Kei-ichiro Miura

    (Department of Clinical Oral Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan
    Department of Oral Surgery, Imakiire General Hospital, Kagoshima 890-0051, Japan)

  • Masashi Yoshida

    (Department of Oral Surgery, Imakiire General Hospital, Kagoshima 890-0051, Japan)

  • Satoshi Rokutanda

    (Department of Clinical Oral Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan
    Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Juko Memorial Nagasaki Hospital, Nagasaki 852-8004, Japan)

  • Takamitsu Koga

    (Department of Oral Surgery, Imakiire General Hospital, Kagoshima 890-0051, Japan)

  • Masahiro Umeda

    (Department of Clinical Oral Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan)

Abstract

Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is a standard surgical technique for patients with mandibular prognathism. However, the appropriate position of the proximal fragment is not strictly defined, and rigid fixation can induce early postoperative skeletal relapse and temporomandibular (TMJ) disorders. Loose fixation can be expected to seat the proximal bone fragments in a physiologically appropriate position, thereby reducing adverse events. Although long-term skeletal stability has been achieved using SSRO without fixation, the evaluation of preoperative and postoperative eating and swallowing functions remains unclear, and this study aimed to clarify this point. We evaluated mastication time, oral transfer time, and pharyngeal transfer time using videofluorography (VF) preoperatively, two months postoperatively, and six months postoperatively, and along with the position of anatomical landmarks using cephalometric radiographs, modified water swallowing test (MWST), food test (FT), and repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST) were used to evaluate postoperative swallowing function. Four patients (one male, three females; mean (range) age 26.5 (18–51) years) were included, with a mean setback of 9.5 mm and 6.5 mm on the right and left sides, respectively. Postoperative eating and swallowing functions were good in VF, cephalometric analysis, MWST, FT, and RSST. In the present study, good results for postoperative eating and swallowing functions were obtained in SSRO with loose fixation of the proximal and distal bone segments.

Suggested Citation

  • Kei-ichiro Miura & Masashi Yoshida & Satoshi Rokutanda & Takamitsu Koga & Masahiro Umeda, 2023. "Swallowing Functions after Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy with Loose Fixation for Mandibular Prognathism: A Retrospective Case Series Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-9, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1926-:d:1042185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1926/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1926/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oren Peleg & Reema Mahmoud & Amir Shuster & Shimrit Arbel & Shlomi Kleinman & Eitan Mijiritsky & Clariel Ianculovici, 2022. "Vertical Ramus Osteotomy, Is It Still a Valid Tool in Orthognathic Surgery?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-8, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1926-:d:1042185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.