IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p1903-d1041961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exploration of the Influence of Non-Biomechanical Factors on Lifting-Related LBP

Author

Listed:
  • Nic Saraceni

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6845, Western Australia, Australia)

  • Amity Campbell

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6845, Western Australia, Australia)

  • Peter Kent

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6845, Western Australia, Australia
    Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark)

  • Leo Ng

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6845, Western Australia, Australia)

  • Leon Straker

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6845, Western Australia, Australia)

  • Peter O’Sullivan

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley 6845, Western Australia, Australia
    Body Logic Physiotherapy, Shenton Park 6008, Western Australia, Australia)

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective was to compare non-biomechanical factors between manual workers with and without a history of LBP related to lifting. A secondary objective was to investigate associations between the change in pain intensity during repeated lifting (termed pain ramp) and non-biomechanical factors tested in the LBP group. Methods: Manual workers currently in lifting occupations with and without a history of lifting-related LBP were recruited (21 LBP and 20 noLBP) and took part in a repeated (100) lift task. A series of non-biomechanical factors, including psychological, work-related, lifestyle, whole health and psychophysical factors, were collected. Psychophysical factors (pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and fatigue) were also measured at different time points. Associations between pain ramp during lifting and non-biomechanical factors were investigated with linear regression. Results: The LBP group reported worse perceived sleep quality, more musculoskeletal pain sites other than LBP and greater symptoms related to gastrointestinal complaints and pseudo-neurology compared to the group with no history of LBP. The group with LBP were also slightly more worried about the lifting task and felt more fatigued at the end of the lifting task. The feeling of fatigue during lifting was positively associated with pain ramp in the LBP group. Anxiety and gastrointestinal complaints were weakly negatively associated with pain ramp during lifting. Conclusions: The group differences of poorer perceived sleep, greater non-specific health complaints, slightly more worry about the lifting task and more perceived fatigue in the LBP group highlight the complex and multi-factorial nature of LBP related to lifting. The feeling of fatigue was positively associated with pain ramp in the LBP group, suggesting a close relationship with pain and fatigue during lifting that requires further exploration.

Suggested Citation

  • Nic Saraceni & Amity Campbell & Peter Kent & Leo Ng & Leon Straker & Peter O’Sullivan, 2023. "An Exploration of the Influence of Non-Biomechanical Factors on Lifting-Related LBP," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1903-:d:1041961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1903/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1903/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonas Vinstrup & Markus D. Jakobsen & Lars L. Andersen, 2020. "Poor Sleep Is a Risk Factor for Low-Back Pain among Healthcare Workers: Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-8, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1903-:d:1041961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.