IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p1724-d1039223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Deep Learning Model in the Sonographic Diagnosis of Uterine Adenomyosis

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Raimondo

    (Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Antonio Raffone

    (Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
    Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Anna Chiara Aru

    (Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
    Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Matteo Giorgi

    (Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy)

  • Ilaria Giaquinto

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morgagni–Pierantoni Hospital, 47100 Forlì, Italy)

  • Emanuela Spagnolo

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Paseo de la Castellana, 28046 Madrid, Spain)

  • Antonio Travaglino

    (Pathology Unit, Department of Woman and Child’s Health and Public Health Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
    Pathology Unit, Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Federico Andrea Galatolo

    (Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy)

  • Mario Giovanni Cosimo Antonio Cimino

    (Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy)

  • Jacopo Lenzi

    (Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Gabriele Centini

    (Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy)

  • Lucia Lazzeri

    (Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy)

  • Antonio Mollo

    (Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry “Schola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, 84084 Baronissi, Italy)

  • Renato Seracchioli

    (Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
    Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Paolo Casadio

    (Division of Gynecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Deep Learning (DL) machine for the detection of adenomyosis on uterine ultrasonographic images and compare it to intermediate ultrasound skilled trainees. Methods: Prospective observational study were conducted between 1 and 30 April 2022. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) diagnosis of adenomyosis was investigated by an experienced sonographer on 100 fertile-age patients. Videoclips of the uterine corpus were recorded and sequential ultrasound images were extracted. Intermediate ultrasound-skilled trainees and DL machine were asked to make a diagnosis reviewing uterine images. We evaluated and compared the accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive value, F1-score, specificity and negative predictive value of the DL model and the trainees for adenomyosis diagnosis. Results: Accuracy of DL and intermediate ultrasound-skilled trainees for the diagnosis of adenomyosis were 0.51 (95% CI, 0.48–0.54) and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.60–0.79), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and F1-score of DL were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.38–0.48), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79–0.85) and 0.46 (0.42–0.50), respectively, whereas intermediate ultrasound-skilled trainees had sensitivity of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.52–0.86), specificity of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.58–0.79) and F1-score of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.43–0.66). Conclusions: In this preliminary study DL model showed a lower accuracy but a higher specificity in diagnosing adenomyosis on ultrasonographic images compared to intermediate-skilled trainees.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Raimondo & Antonio Raffone & Anna Chiara Aru & Matteo Giorgi & Ilaria Giaquinto & Emanuela Spagnolo & Antonio Travaglino & Federico Andrea Galatolo & Mario Giovanni Cosimo Antonio Cimino & Jacop, 2023. "Application of Deep Learning Model in the Sonographic Diagnosis of Uterine Adenomyosis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-9, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1724-:d:1039223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1724/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1724/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1724-:d:1039223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.