IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p1721-d1039112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not Getting Vaccinated? It Is a Matter of Problem-Solving Abilities and Socio-Cognitive Polarization

Author

Listed:
  • Alice Cancer

    (Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy)

  • Carola Salvi

    (Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
    Department of Psychology and Social Sciences, John Cabot University, 00165 Rome, Italy)

  • Alessandro Antonietti

    (Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy)

  • Paola Iannello

    (Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

The anti-COVID-19 vaccination campaign in the United States provided a significant contribution to the control of the virus spread. Despite the recommendations by public health institutions, vaccine skepticism and hesitancy contributed to low vaccine uptake, thus possibly disrupting the management of preventable diseases associated with the COVID-19 infection. The process that led individuals to accept COVID-19 vaccines required the ability to gather, synthesize, and weigh-up information within a novel, dynamically changing, complex, and ambiguous context. To deal with such complexity, we hypothesized that both the ability of reflection and flexible adaptation played a fundamental role. Based on previous research on cognitive predictors of vaccine refusal, we decided to investigate the combined role of two constructs, namely, problem-solving skills and socio-cognitive polarization (SCP), on vaccine acceptance and uptake. Two-hundred-seventy-seven US participants completed an online survey aimed to measure problem-solving ability, through a rebus puzzles task, and SCP, through a composite measure of absolutist thinking, political conservatism, and xenophobia. Mediation analyses indicated that SCP mediated the association between problem-solving ability and vaccine acceptance, so lower problem-solving abilities associated with higher polarization predicted vaccine rejection. Thus, our findings suggested that low problem-solving skills may represent a risk factor for COVID-19 vaccine refusal, with cognitive and social rigidity playing a crucial role in undermining the anti-COVID-19 vaccine uptake.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice Cancer & Carola Salvi & Alessandro Antonietti & Paola Iannello, 2023. "Not Getting Vaccinated? It Is a Matter of Problem-Solving Abilities and Socio-Cognitive Polarization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-9, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1721-:d:1039112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1721/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1721/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kees Veer & Reidar Ommundsen & Oksana Yakushko & Laurens Higler & Susan Woelders & Kari Hagen, 2013. "Psychometrically and qualitatively validating a cross-national cumulative measure of fear-based xenophobia," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 1429-1444, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petrescu-Mag, Ruxandra Malina & Petrescu, Dacinia Crina & Todoran, Silviu Ciprian & Petrescu-Mag, Ioan Valentin, 2021. "Us and them. Is the COVID-19 pandemic a driver for xenophobia in land transactions in Romania?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1721-:d:1039112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.